IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-duplicate-03

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net> Thu, 26 June 2008 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ippm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ippm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08F73A6916; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C893A690C for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n2two1876adE for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postman.ripe.net (postman.ripe.net [193.0.19.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FB33A67AE for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 4008) id 1ABC723FA0; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from herring.ripe.net (herring.ripe.net [193.0.1.203]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DE923F83; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:36:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from guest-wv-47.ripe.net (gw.office.nsrp.ripe.net [193.0.1.126]) by herring.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CDB2F583; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:36:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <48635502.4020300@ripe.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:36:18 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
References: <484FD51A.9030601@internet2.edu> <4850124B.207@internet2.edu> <200806260210.m5Q2A00c007908@alph001.aldc.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <200806260210.m5Q2A00c007908@alph001.aldc.att.com>
X-RIPE-Spam-Level:
X-RIPE-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
X-RIPE-Spam-Status: N 0.000001 / -4.4
X-RIPE-Signature: 453a57650e192fdc778ce18d375e39b7
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-duplicate-03
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ippm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ippm-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Al, others,

> I suggest:
>    Two packets are considered identical if and only if:
>    + both were sent by one and the same host
>    + both contain identical information fields
>    + both contain valid, but not necessarily identical IP header fields

I think this is a good summary of what we're trying to say.

Henk

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre          http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk
P.O.Box 10096          Singel 258         Phone: +31.20.5354414
1001 EB Amsterdam      1016 AB Amsterdam  Fax: +31.20.5354445
The Netherlands        The Netherlands    Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is one of the choices leaving the office open?
                                       Alan Greenspan on the next elections
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status