IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Wed, 24 February 2016 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EEB1B341C for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:21:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BcKrIPnPdNY6 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5B41B31FB for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:21:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8936; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1456330914; x=1457540514; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=petvBFasUNccN0faNg7D8fCfYZXc9Rkq390R2dPcNHA=; b=Jou6Hn43zre8LWr8ForNtz4vGqVXn9RG4DoggS4FhxZ6BLW2tLyUVQT+ lKUadO32D9rhjry0Zniwo53z4BgpCSgzoI+jILC/N1heuV7dWsVH/PEC7 UDb8z+Y3+kJpiwO+CUwOKPLCL+rOblCvnnGKUFC2usT0MphDa0aac61pU 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKAgB52M1W/4UNJK1egm5MUm0GumkBDYFmhg4CgUI4FAEBAQEBAQFkJ4RBAQEBBC1MEAIBCBEDAQEBKAcyFAkIAQEEAQ0FiB++WwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARWGEoQ6hFUWhAQFjWKFEYQUAY1egV6ERIhSjkgBHgEBQoNkaoZjAXwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.22,494,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="76391381"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Feb 2016 16:21:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u1OGLqa8023678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:21:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:21:52 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:21:51 -0600
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, "draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org" <draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
Thread-Index: AdFqbLsNtCaeQhkcSNaNNzLViFP6yQDKKviwAGSdoAA=
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:21:51 +0000
Message-ID: <D2F278FD.128927%rrahman@cisco.com>
References: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112219DD0CE@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112219DD0CE@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.9.151119
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.143]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2F278FD128927rrahmanciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/8qfNEdSyouiIqBRFnEA7Pt1ZBvI>
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:21:56 -0000

Hi Greg,

Apologies for the delayed response. I agree with your comment.

Regards,
Reshad.

From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com<mailto:gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>>
Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM
To: "draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org>>
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>" <ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
Resent-From: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com<mailto:gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>>
Resent-To: <draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@ietf.org<mailto:draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@ietf.org>>
Resent-Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM

Dear Authors, et. al,
please consider this comment as part of WG adoption call discussion.

                Regards,
                                Greg

From: Gregory Mirsky
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 8:59 AM
To: 'draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org<mailto:'draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org>'
Cc: ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang

Dear Authors,
I've noticed that detailed data model examples in Appendix A use UDP port numbers from the registered range of UDP port numbers. The registered range is administered by IANA and port numbers should not be used for applications other than it was registered to. I believe that UDP port numbers for TWAMP test must be used from dynamic, private range of port numbers 49152-65535. Use of port numbers described in RFC 6335 in details.

What do you think?

                Regards,
                                Greg

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status