[ippm] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-07: (with DISCUSS)

Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 04 September 2019 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099EA120A3A; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp@ietf.org, Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com, ippm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <156761599202.22808.13015902618373150935.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 09:53:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/9JfUvZMwrqPlKR8TJk5PBuxolCk>
Subject: [ippm] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-07: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 16:53:13 -0000

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-07: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm sure this will be easy to either explain to me or re-phrase:

Sections 4 and 6 both say something like "MUST be agreed by all users of the
network".  What does that really mean?  How is it remotely possible to get
agreement from all users of your network?  How is it remotely possible that
they could understand what you're asking them to agree to?