[ippm] Splitting draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 09 May 2025 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D7E26F7F22; Fri, 9 May 2025 12:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gAw8NM2DgE_r; Fri, 9 May 2025 12:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E95326F7F15; Fri, 9 May 2025 12:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5fc3f0a5506so4495364a12.0; Fri, 09 May 2025 12:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1746818379; x=1747423179; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dTExVTryIHlMW5A+Jj5BHW9CKFpsWha2HEmbTv7OLe0=; b=Z6Kjp0GtMuLvCbW5zOLh7+6YzxnJn55WS2kgWAVy4SGXjeZEmD587w6ZuQabxlvov2 x0Si+/Dk3fgM4h+3e1MJB1QPR8cvlt8jZUhgCZzHm+XsPh3NUALyntrB9nMMgOzTAqDR WZZhXWXZNTgT7B9TuXKrjeh10jEC9WuuuOZFkMgj5rFcL20aeiVrs3UzRnx91Cr57+lf IbIVlT9nCidiO26oBtXA+jmc0/ezE90mj2ZiVm4mv2v+Debxb6isgSLl3EJsP4rr1vRP IXdAr4eBadqhdksiSMPVoIXGHQJlxCMdN1FODKXS5qElbacZDyDrbEGztbNW5CiWsqYw Y5Gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1746818379; x=1747423179; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dTExVTryIHlMW5A+Jj5BHW9CKFpsWha2HEmbTv7OLe0=; b=M+yP6X8m67+8RCijuIkiWJi+HLfEntK0cY4f+HKJViYDJbV+Gk/gquRVRI14nVYWE4 E7YTkEu+H69iny8nwPTwFoAmuj0lydR0U3A1gDPtsQtxExWxs/Q7fKEjonfcx3yYAPlK WPjceu9iULhnJIBjnoWJKR2LFKYv0qeg4VTTKLCuzfR8lywACnS1FwK/blQZIxpa6/xm lsULlNikIgqVC80NTWz1ZcS/WN08oxm6WKqvBzwklS0lvw+x5zzP6jdPBRoqaezdI3nN 5k/vIaHyHwMS4JlcyG856bhUHzqz15yuNDoaLBRPSTYBLE4MA90IwHB7civnmSdi9cT9 UiKw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUOELljcb2QP/MeLuPhgzwzdLYdn+hBLoQeKS/sxrEHK330L34kmNjzpZM67CjLYyg6tstQXgYV84Z76w==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwqL42Bs9W5HaRAwlNtWLZXHsAXrYPfFXoUVGs8WL2M0EIpIRV1 mqXbuGBlCLqGgkZyPtDtFqNMpW/AGeaix9uJ3XccfFM9zKZgBv/9MijBAZIaGc+2oB7GXEh11mA Sz3u7+B7hECdoA1ij1+zLpD5ypP2HvXno/g==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvMw1W4w3HsnT5eW3SljvizH7p4TtHSUPDOVLx2Vb7OpuHFAuXWwzbY+SkJ7TE 39s/1l+JOzJbGHZnuE7ImEOqlf4m1AmfyG40fcg7mU51FPrUrCewXKYocostOdM4c48q4IKKBvm nMFmf5WvGfToLms3DknNUTpJak1QOle8Yl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFN5z1OR2fuk5YN4GwM1R/iRXeqROxqd9WpYsN9nzhvuMwjPkNOTLgIANRNwtkHXhiz4apyCQhRWpyedAIVwcM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:99c2:b0:ace:52f6:8500 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ad219169e2bmr474102766b.45.1746818378836; Fri, 09 May 2025 12:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 15:19:27 -0400
X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFvosl9j76EIY2aXC3Wi4asvMNGITIf4hnVb3_Oj1uPl66EdK8oGVzV9m3c
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6eUj3OTYibkL=Cb7prbdr3MD9aj-JE2pB6RNtv2MQgr1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f52d080634b8d834"
Message-ID-Hash: TYGTEABVGA2DN3GSRMGORJ76KJLWEFHN
X-Message-ID-Hash: TYGTEABVGA2DN3GSRMGORJ76KJLWEFHN
X-MailFrom: rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ippm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] Splitting draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/AaARpNw6c6zY62wTpbuz_l_hmGU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ippm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ippm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ippm-leave@ietf.org>

Hello IPPM Chairs,



STAMP Extensions for Reflecting Packet Headers draft includes both IPv6 and
MPLS Data planes.



   - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr/



The MPLS data plane part has normative dependency on the on-going work in
MPLS WG, specifically, on the MPLS Network Action (MNA).



As mentioned in the last IETF meeting, to avoid delaying the work for IPv6
data plane (and WG LC), we, authors, would like to split this draft into
two documents, one for each data plane.



Please advise if this is possible and what would be the next steps.



Many thanks,

Rakesh (for authors)