IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] IETF 110 Draft Agenda Posted

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 19 February 2021 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386433A08C0 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQnjjFgzsiJ9 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A1B3A08BE for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id v6so28935720ljh.9 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=L5vFuqI1ysl6JMcehunbaQmke3Qid1n+8IBW2Xq5c/Y=; b=YwO/YvXfdkk0feCJDyOF5py8cFMw0q1q1tiYZ348wyzkw9ZNNEYx9jx6Fx8Ub/jX7v 5lFUkAch0sYCpgZBEogTdcg/x9B4V1enngP4UoTomPRHMwWG5Njz7EhMnnGxiMBe2MT3 TSoH1zcF5N2JnhMm63ETU5smM3nLa0cQsWcmrX1Kc5kmCVQbcBpGrwrXpYdkW9kLr1Qn B71FICOFlGQESSA3Xp3WNYKGoif51OmYKxSBiz2oBv3/gf1v6XCnpbRWtWLGZhCMitd0 +rolwogfi1ZlVkX3p35UF0hY2KilaQbWZfRWVN74qU/j2GSoxWTWl+Xt8l54HFSjl6g8 izNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=L5vFuqI1ysl6JMcehunbaQmke3Qid1n+8IBW2Xq5c/Y=; b=Duqsa2OGErPO4FWyojEySJjpx5IU1HlbvBfSWh5+KHkU76Qcvw55NhYZXFdYJPPfnu 0yW63jbJy+teDX9C9SiJy0ZWfyIuBzYjsR7BFiGFSk0l/q83m6gHBh0YbjUx3iYncSzm KqtecUgDUNEeDqMR0UY/DqY++L8+1TGfQGRpG8eBskXjV1ZaxY4nGKTy95u58BLJM36h sYgUyoEjeeZVCggNVm/nqTSabVedxPC/4QlL/rTrwD5j4f0Wqbd5i3QFunJyWxfy+/ua PORxOExI31eqR5U/UC/+4kQlN9JCESpUtNjjIE2k/WgTJ9KaLofkwGgzXY/ptqUa/vxe mGEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BaJgbPJ2q1OzRoj8uIrTXnvZH3QM7oM1hBPJAzqdfYRoVpJ0p fh7lt0K+j1F48xdsjUAGEmgAkga94ezhjKcea4Eh1zlccg0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQTv6B+b/v8P+wFtfryvuViipTe/VYfQ5fQaJozCnFonJcCVEnImGhukqdvFUb6fkxAPsGBmrrfnmHsHd/fqI=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5285:: with SMTP id q5mr6947521lfm.109.1613771064197; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5F5C0A34-DD09-4622-8828-6D3625703B06@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <5F5C0A34-DD09-4622-8828-6D3625703B06@apple.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVjfS31MpW=4gori=vd28fBGf15b1FyaauHsOk3PLDYew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000007c3f305bbb75be1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/BKuKFkzmqdLzwSI0ApA__bnLQg4>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IETF 110 Draft Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 21:44:28 -0000

Hi Tommy,
thank you for preparing the agenda. I would not have an update on the STAMP
YANG data model for this meeting. The work is going on but it took longer
than expected.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:53 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello IPPM,
>
> I’ve just posted our draft agenda for IETF 110:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/agenda-110-ippm-00
>
> This time, we’ll have two separate sessions. The first session on Monday
> will be focused on trying to close out some discussions and make decisions
> for various IOAM documents. The second session on Friday will focus on the
> other working group documents, proposed work, and lightning talks. We do
> have additional lightning talk slots available, so please email the chairs
> if you are interested.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Ian
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status