[ippm] updated postcard-based telemetry draft
Haoyu song <haoyu.song@huawei.com> Mon, 22 April 2019 18:07 UTC
Return-Path: <haoyu.song@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B7B120122; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EzfLgjNwaRgH; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 11:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C036E120077; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 11:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9588115BCE9B5A58A53C; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:07:03 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.39) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:07:02 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.31]) by SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 11:07:00 -0700
From: Haoyu song <haoyu.song@huawei.com>
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] updated postcard-based telemetry draft
Thread-Index: AdT5Ni1I/N+4OysGSnGXpY8JMakpsQ==
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 18:06:59 +0000
Message-ID: <78A2745BE9B57D4F9D27F86655EB87F9376A7CF0@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.209.217.2]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_78A2745BE9B57D4F9D27F86655EB87F9376A7CF0sjceml521mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/BXYGkCqI6b02vWiBiqo9HavkJ1Y>
Subject: [ippm] updated postcard-based telemetry draft
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 18:07:07 -0000
Hi all, We just updated the draft which reflects the side-meeting discussion results from IETF104. PBT-I is renamed as an IOAM mode, PHP (Per Hop Postcard) mode. The common header fields are arranged to align with IOAM trace mode header and their specification are supposed to be specified in the IOAM data draft. Please review the draft and provide your comments. Thank you very much! https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-03.txt Best regards, Haoyu