[ippm] Re: IPPM adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 23 May 2024 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E088C17C884 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zWC-HiXEg4wX for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59302C16942D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4e4eff99f16so126272e0c.1 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716508194; x=1717112994; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6WQ+d2/qve2g+rVGsrGImmf0iF54fnz2U5XbjCOY2lw=; b=AA5b/9AMzt5xnpfbI8jkeGYOTFv5liW81JoDlVdPsYIcqrZIetL59NQj57ivAYbTy5 YHZ/sivXBQQ06zvu2lYmzaJxkpkQCEvBZ8VlOsrdeonjwpsnazIjH+fjfMe6vSloyv7i 6l9ZM6tWV0MN2NWw77CnNf3+6o9ODRyd9BjB4ejN3587XV36CEBxdzLYLxKpCtf9oamO kBS/B9kWEpQkbmMLaKtRvo0ooRaMNfASJtQP+Q9E919ZVJXKWVlmUJdCHUXlstimKaOz NVlw2TcQF9iQ5BSYLfmkevovMlGkdk116kJ8b6qCpR4/YCeAlJ1dSYt9HWEUjjC+Xe0/ gvuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716508194; x=1717112994; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6WQ+d2/qve2g+rVGsrGImmf0iF54fnz2U5XbjCOY2lw=; b=fU+NSdO3hn9uGKptoUuxH9CM6Ib5MDa1Ven4SpNjrvaW03pn7cApYZGiEt6vks3AqZ cozbYkyg2JOFoluXGcBpix04VlVxyZvJvG/V2/H12czVrBzCfSxy3ePH1wlueQNm/YSp DMZ5QCdGtiGHAQjZaVwfJvv9u3sx2HmBQOq1GUhkcUlhK+pP9j7uy/DyfMIjh32fGUi8 dQ1jaDwWz+ImXVtdjwTXj0d0JpZ80p2G4DEfnMItJ6GtZb8ajKaOeWPR4yqGv4/jGSRV YFMDeEJzO4WRmTfszMsCqfyUH5uccjm6sBh4+psQSDL7WKcyoRlPregONkPmNkIu8dm1 o0Zw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWitBW2ie/I9/Oi4ypWbyk+4KeGZ7PSeG50eTLanu9jFQHhouDrazF7TnXZKxva3s22D04XKsgA3teoE+lN
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwPwSJr4bY1fa/pZP/LSWavdDQeTdrBMxnXrdh0fEiZMjbE2hog cwMY35hrzbB6V6f3zwUwmddGT2VbIjig0X77o5akPq6MGQKJzfRwQxXhVbR0TxDdtsEytY4PhD1 gocrTXbD3FddlYZ5SjNGSHiyPRTjbz5S3utYt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IENAbvP99yrBqZaen5MAKGWnIBlQ4FGZbEQUzgATi6JOQBwXIpKt+oLrSu4xEV5mmeKOf8dACG9+K8ZYlLndgA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:4127:b0:4e4:eda9:ec32 with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4e4f02d0410mr879004e0c.10.1716508194074; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DB9PR07MB8983B9EDCD816FA4F586E2EEE21F2@DB9PR07MB8983.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <2537c58565904b1c84380a6cef536c68@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <2537c58565904b1c84380a6cef536c68@huawei.com>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 19:49:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6c1LT=ZyJZ_DmfkSSbXD-x0D=6+FS+Yb0OpYLBd7Qcn2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002977e9061927b5a2"
X-MailFrom: rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ippm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] Re: IPPM adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ippm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ippm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ippm-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Giuseppe,

Thank you for your support and suggestions.

As mentioned in the Abstract -

This document extends
STAMP to reflect any IPv6 options and MPLS Network Action Sub-Stacks
for hop-by-hop and edge-to-edge active measurements, including IOAM
data fields.

We will further describe use-cases that were in the previous version
in Section 5.

5.  Generic Applicability

   The procedure and extensions defined in this document for STAMP for
   IPv6 data plane are generic and can be used by Session-Sender and
   Session-Reflector test packets to reflect any IPv6 option (not just
   limited to the IPv6 options with IOAM data fields) for HBH and E2E
   two-way active measurement as shown in Figure 6.  For example, using
   the Alternate Marking Method (AMM) IPv6 destination option defined in
   RFC 9343, Performance and Diagnostic Metrics (PDM) IPv6 option
   defined in RFC 8250, Maximum Path MTU IPv6 option defined in RFC
   9268, and any other IPv6 option that may be defined in future.

Thank you for your willingness to work together on this to cover
various use-cases.


Rakesh (for authors)

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:34 AM Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola=
40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Dear All,
> I support the adoption of this draft, but I think that the scope of the
> document should become more general and cover all the variations of the
> STAMP HBH measurements leveraging the IPv6 options/MNA sub-stacks.
> We recently updated draft-wang-ippm-stamp-hbh-extensions to add a section
> on how to perform HBH active measurements by using STAMP in combination
> with the IPv6 HBH options (IOAM, AltMark). In addition to the Reflected
> STAMP TLV, it is described the use of IPFIX/YANG Push to report telemetry
> information from each intermediate node to a collector.
> It would make sense to describe all the possibilities in a single document.
> As also discussed offline with Rakesh, I’m fully available to cooperate
> and integrate draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.
> Regards,
> Giuseppe
> *From:* ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Marcus Ihlar
> *Sent:* Friday, May 3, 2024 4:03 PM
> *To:* IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [ippm] IPPM adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr
> Hello IPPM,
> This email starts an adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.
> This document has a normative dependency on
> draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts that was recently adopted by the IPPM
> working group.
> You can find the draft here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr/
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-00.html
> Please review the draft and respond to this email to indicate if you think
> IPPM should adopt this document as a working group item.
> This call will last for 3 weeks. Please reply by *Friday**, May 24*.
> Best,
> Marcus & Tommy
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list -- ippm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ippm-leave@ietf.org