Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Wed, 31 July 2019 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A20912004E; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1qUofRPvSk16; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803D812004A; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DEA05AF733E3D71C4332; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:57:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:57:35 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:57:28 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
CC: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
Thread-Index: AQHVQxPgl8uBcHGYaUqUk7BQykX/oqbgepaAgAOWWHA=
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 02:57:28 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEEF3C49@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+RyBmVnkMFEQv=Hr3y9OD09+_vocHRgnGQnLwEVO=yuTcptEQ@mail.gmail.com> <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch> <4AC4BE58-D387-4230-974F-1E313AA49E45@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AC4BE58-D387-4230-974F-1E313AA49E45@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.156.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/Br2OU9sO-Ct2AjK-ZRBqzQhlFEM>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 02:57:40 -0000

I support wg adoption of draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags.

Cheers,
Tianran

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro
> (cpignata)
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 12:10 PM
> To: Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch>
> Cc: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>rg>; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re:
> Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
> 
> Hi, Brian,
> 
> I support adoption of draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags. This is an important
> set of definition of flags for real uses based on experience. It fulfills
> part of the charter milestone below complementing the base ioam-data,
> realizing specific use cases, as an offspring document from ioam-data.
> 
> I’m a co-author.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carlos.
> 
> > On Jul 25, 2019, at 2:07 PM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> >
> > hi Greg,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback; absolutely, we can do this the normal way. Authors:
> let's do a normal two-week adoption call for this document before publishing
> the update.
> >
> > This adoption call starts now.
> >
> > IPPM, please respond to this message with an indication to the mailing list
> of your support for adopting draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags as a working group
> document, in partial fulfillment of our charter milestone "submit a Standards
> Track draft on inband OAM based measurement methodologies to the IESG"
> (obviously, depending on how many documents we end up sending to the IESG,
> we may have to change the plurality of this milestone). If you do not support
> this, please send a message to the list explaining why.
> >
> > Thanks, cheers,
> >
> > Brian (as IPPM co-chair)
> >
> >
> >> On 25 Jul 2019, at 13:15, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Chairs, et al.,
> >> I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the
> decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material not
> directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the document.
> The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many comments.
> I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to the
> charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Greg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ippm mailing list
> > ippm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm