Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

Xuhui Cai <> Thu, 08 September 2022 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6ABC14CF0B for <>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCqEAaD6qxQr for <>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72485C14F734 for <>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE; BC=0.07822061|-1; BR=01201311R201S28rulernew998_84748_2000303; CH=blue; DM=|CONTINUE|false|; DS=CONTINUE|ham_enroll_verification|0.0249249-0.00634801-0.968727; FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=ay29a033018047194;; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=2; RT=2; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---.PApePve_1662617099;
Received: from LAPTOP-T3K7QCM7( fp:SMTPD_---.PApePve_1662617099) by; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:05:00 +0800
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:04:59 +0800
From: Xuhui Cai <>
To: 'Marcus Ihlar' <>, 'IETF IPPM WG' <>
References: <>, <>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart881263744865_=----"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:05:41 -0000

Hi WG,

I support the adoption of these drafts.

As a controller vendor, our controller has supported the automatic configuration of micro twamp and the acquisition of PM on LAG results through BGP LS and telemetry. 
It has been deployed in the production network of operators, and it works well. The controller can accurately find the member links with different delays in trunk.This deployment mode can be used for reference.

Best Regards
Xuhui Cai

发件人: ippm <> 代表 Marcus Ihlar
发送时间: 2022年9月2日 00:44
收件人: IETF IPPM WG ( <>
主题: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG
Hello IPPM,
This email starts an adoption call in the IPPM working group for the draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag and draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag documents. These documents extend STAMP, OWAMP and TWAMP to support performance measurements on member links of a Link Aggregation Group.
The first draft specifies an extension to STAMP and can be found here: 
The second draft specifies extensions to OWAMP and TWAMP and can be found here:
Please reply to this email by Thursday September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of these documents.
Marcus & Tommy