Re: [ippm] draft-wang-ippm-alt-mark-yang-00 Thu, 21 July 2022 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF95C15948D for <>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 02:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.907
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.998, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CHzh2CNRPKGE for <>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 02:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03063C14CF11 for <>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 02:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4LpRdl5zrZz8R042; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:11:39 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by with SMTP id 26L9A0JE049658; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:10:01 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from
Received: from mapi (njxapp05[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:10:01 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:10:01 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afd62d917e9ffffffffccd4a2c9
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <>
To: <>
Cc: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: 26L9A0JE049658
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04- with ID 62D9184B.002 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1658394699/4LpRdl5zrZz8R042/62D9184B.002/[]/<>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 62D9184B.002/4LpRdl5zrZz8R042
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [ippm] =?utf-8?q?draft-wang-ippm-alt-mark-yang-00?=
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 09:11:47 -0000

Hi Giuseppe,

Thank you for the response.
The current YANG model is from our implementation. I'm sure there are many things that can be improved.
Let's work together to improve and generalize it.

Xiao Min
From: GiuseppeFioccola <>
To: 肖敏10093570; <>rg>;
Date: 2022年07月21日 15:57
Subject: RE: [ippm] draft-wang-ippm-alt-mark-yang-00
Hi Xiao,
Thank you for proposing this document.
It was also a point raised during the LC of draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8321bis.
I will surely read and share my comments.
-----Original Message-----
From: ippm <> On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 3:26 AM
Subject: [ippm] draft-wang-ippm-alt-mark-yang-00
Dear IPPM,
A new I-D draft-wang-ippm-alt-mark-yang-00 has been posted, it's a YANG data model on Alternate Marking Method.
Your review and comments are much appreciated.
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
ippm mailing list