Re: [ippm] Fwd: Expiration impending: draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Mon, 09 January 2012 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18EE21F86AE for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 01:05:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LC8iJd9b0FbF for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 01:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D1521F866E for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 01:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0994pPM005723 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:04:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4F0AADB3.5090507@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:04:51 +0100
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
References: <20120102124211.27668.72574.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F01B336.1010405@uijterwaal.nl> <201201061926.q06JQOAO027273@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <201201061926.q06JQOAO027273@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: Expiration impending: draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:05:29 -0000

> I updated this draft, checking for open issues raised on the list
> last year, and nits raised by the nit checker.  The results are in 02,
> below.

As a participant: while the text in section 10 is correct, this is
mainly background information for the IANA.  There should be statement
saying that the entire section 10 can be removed on publication.

Henk



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
                                          http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)