Re: [ippm] Metrics & Recommended Value
Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Mon, 16 April 2012 06:02 UTC
Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5A321F8678 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HbqrHNfRdJoF for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4E821F8670 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3G61cJq044899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:01:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4F8BB5C2.2090605@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:01:38 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ippm@ietf.org
References: <6200CC0ECA70B741AC22E1C2C5ACC2F60AEF12@EX-1.qubee.com.bd>
In-Reply-To: <6200CC0ECA70B741AC22E1C2C5ACC2F60AEF12@EX-1.qubee.com.bd>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: Re: [ippm] Metrics & Recommended Value
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:02:26 -0000
On 15/04/2012 12:34, Md. Abdul Wohab (Mithun) wrote:
> Can I please have the IP performance metric list along with the standard
> recommended value?
One way:
RFC 2679 Delay
2680 Packet loss
3393 Delay Variation
4737 Packet Reordering
5560 Duplication
Two way:
2681 Round trip Delay
draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-04.txt Loss
For other documents, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ippm/
The IPPM group only defines the metrics, specifying recommended
values (that is, defining "good" or "bad") is outside its scope.
Henk
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
http://www.uijterwaal.nl
Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
(John Glanfield, on an engineering project)
- [ippm] Metrics & Recommended Value Md. Abdul Wohab (Mithun)
- Re: [ippm] Metrics & Recommended Value Henk Uijterwaal