[ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (5549)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 04 March 2020 10:43 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF7D3A0C0B; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 02:43:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 413Tai08gEIF; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 02:43:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B4C3A0C0A; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 02:43:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4FA7FF40721; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 02:43:19 -0800 (PST)
To: prabhjot.sethi@gmail.com, acmorton@att.com, lencia@att.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ietf@kuehlewind.net, iesg@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200304104319.4FA7FF40721@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 02:43:19 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/GByqM55aoM0Jbhsj846NnyV6kMY>
Subject: [ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (5549)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 10:43:44 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6038, "Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5549 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Prabhjot Singh Sethi <prabhjot.sethi@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2018-11-07 Verified by: Mirja Kühlewind (IESG) Section: 5.1.5 Original Text ------------- In this combined mode, the Packet Padding to be reflected follows the 27 MBZ octets. In Authenticated or Encrypted modes, the Packet Padding to be reflected follows the 56 MBZ octets. Corrected Text -------------- In this combined mode, the Packet Padding to be reflected follows the 27 MBZ octets. In Authenticated or Encrypted modes, the Packet Padding to be reflected follows the 64 MBZ octets. Notes ----- To achieve symmetrical size in authenticated and encrypted mode length of mbz field needs to be 64 octects instead of 56 octects. -------------------------------------- RFC6038 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features Publication Date : October 2010 Author(s) : A. Morton, L. Ciavattone Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Performance Measurement Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (5549) RFC Errata System