[ippm] next steps with IPPM registry

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Tue, 01 December 2015 05:39 UTC

Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627621B392F for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:39:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Copq2r_EyoDP for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1DEE1B3930 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:39:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmuu63 with SMTP id u63so158029717wmu.0 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:39:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it-uc3m-es.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uv3h+9avLEIaGoRkxSod4zQWUCOn3MkrqbodGKT+ZXM=; b=ghMY7WAPqjDMcYyX6EqKUqW7ZjBjQldU8hNgAwI6O4wV22D1p9+FINH65yhVtaKCNS guS2guSQjv3SvYIXou+uvA+kUW7POEwxh9gtilIX9m2X5K9PhCNojOJxi3lhF4aw7Bca b67THC8P5IEvuaodmhzHoN9S5UuRnPZhYeebu2oe2lSh5X4OU2D1vA4cAb22LRhWmsaa s20hL4t44rRxjoRQxtNSaiJSewq7FkVkaRxu2ONIL0NfEy7GBcDNGsdkOij1JKZSTBq6 nGf8kmImbcRDxR4lqdr+epiAEiciWKFWPS6IYvzfHntFxBbm5uGeDVWNiFT4uhu66lUG SzFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uv3h+9avLEIaGoRkxSod4zQWUCOn3MkrqbodGKT+ZXM=; b=IHUwf85uuk8AENZDVv63woxtpkFxDokLLABZl0orpLGKmonfe5gLhpj+gCxACwEHCs TfQh3pAz1mU/N4w/YcLdl6nrt77wBUS9Sdwyof0uh42YuqfJ5I4ATgUIN+mxImdRFMtH Bg3W7xfTzf/z+TeEGjtBFQtcgd0q/+iJbncHRuI/4MkjpYSAXWHND9Y8yjRKZhfUYIwS AobVyFeglV28ip+rynKbYi5D/fLnbCSmMURJ333ouTd+SX6N0wp1D455vu6WO44OtQEf 6N7aeliNXUDvLWX+FzbBEQCmev3hNqrymYmz45q49UW4qwuQTclsfXtdIP3f2gjWIWrG 13PA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDnQQAEM5T7YbJYyIKOxPQlbWLXwQeXGKrzBMrjfKowUxCzkqWSMK3+S2ggi24b55kVA+E
X-Received: by 10.28.57.215 with SMTP id g206mr34044861wma.82.1448948372461; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:39:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Macintosh-6.local (1.196.222.87.dynamic.jazztel.es. [87.222.196.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a76sm24465798wma.19.2015.11.30.21.39.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:39:31 -0800 (PST)
To: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, "Barbara.Stark@bellsouth.com" <Barbara.Stark@bellsouth.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
Message-ID: <565D3293.9080204@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 06:39:31 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/H3HksLEt7gcM73g18gbfOhA9M3w>
Subject: [ippm] next steps with IPPM registry
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 05:39:36 -0000

Hi,

I understand that the only remaining open issue with the registry is to 
figure out if/how we want to include machine readable information in it.

In order to figure this out, i understand the idea was for proponents of 
doing so should explain the use cases they have in mind, so we can 
understand if we want to do this and now.

I understand Barbara and Juergen were proposing this, so could you (or 
anyone else who thinks this is a good idea) to explain the use cases?

Thanks, marcelo