[ippm] Document Action: 'Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05.txt)
Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> Mon, 12 May 2014 15:09 UTC
Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87351A0732 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2014 08:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yd85h3TwsEml for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2014 08:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm27-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm27-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.215]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6295D1A0713 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 08:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.138.226.179] by nm27.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2014 15:09:14 -0000
Received: from [98.138.87.4] by tm14.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2014 15:09:14 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2014 15:09:14 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 375848.56320.bm@omp1004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 55594 invoked by uid 60001); 12 May 2014 15:09:14 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1399907354; bh=muFPZ2lQsuOBo4Tiw155NU8GopBOGRhqFBQDqpqgW7k=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=G24wyu1Hl/M4tZLfTzgwCvc0lEP2cjNiuVeWCNSZIfDrO93y6uEWsd+veYAoYUGOrxDEZSlCbUCUoJ6t9O6dtR4mLZ3m4orirNO/kAcYufNhINwYEYoz0rqHHmlZyChzL2STP5jxq0XNS6DuTDBU7yaj+cQAOHD5mmFJMZYgdfU=
X-YMail-OSG: Z5RJciYVM1l0_FieSp5sAzGr20bPJwRcmzBRLJzQCThyVS3 Uj1Sa3fATUjEcf7.FDJpenNsbabHs.pFiSgjnWZqm2G5.NGFZ7K17s1dQvFi jaCFa22gstmMtpSh2rIDk4weqGM32pJgB_T928yLzqN3kV4PT51.9YH0.DDZ 23aaomLvxxjEXO6T5qGb48y5LbDSTmvo7DrVQ7bgTKrDABpKQd_YirkMA2F1 DagOu0bneHohd7NQA5FVUVf5k7z2GEJzGVfzVpygdqk9Mty1R6dUoQs.guKB uE.Z7ZdZnB2VABr1yPPuCyLKCG1A0BTpjpzkeop92LXZrsIDweVH2vzMMvvw jo9.vct2.ELoGpGAmfCHmvFtdBrqoFbOpO3PXvR7h4dLqCJVhx72E_oOf1A8 lADNSF2I.D4kefuYY.FMcI9q2iK67WXmD00MbptLoFq9kxpXHtHJ_Lb7Ikbg 1YOTtnOF6vogEyAOGoGQXSQcqfi5UPI8MGpN4LoCGgYahYMZ.nsQ.0ZSTPCK iIqofjBAvbwHMBJc.XPuBKCFugIiIIPs_5IK9CmtFrtZB7CbID_PudsJN4Un tLK91HTA48dhl66qX6bfxzFueO34z5WgND63_94QM37mq0AxTNZRBd5_Vv2q SHGDnXrWuc4lKYKoAaXhuDy5VWCWQ2mZZq3uvZn2N
Received: from [24.130.37.147] by web125106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 08:09:14 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, QWwsCgpTb21lIGNvbW1lbnRzIG9uIGRyYWZ0LW1vcnRvbi1pcHBtLTI2NzktYmlzLTA0LnR4dDoKCjEuIFRoZSBpdGVtcyBpbiBzZWN0aW9uIDEgb2YgUkZDMjY3OWJpcyAoZGVsYXkpIGFwcGVhciB0byBiZSBpbXBsZW1lbnRlZCBpbiB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYnV0IEkgYW0gaGF2aW5nIGEgYml0IG9mIHRyb3VibGUgd2l0aCB1bmRlcnN0YW5kaW5nOgoKIkZ1cnRoZXIsIGVuZm9yY2luZyBhIHNwZWNpZmljIGNvbnN0YW50IHdhaXRpbmcgdGltZSBvbiBzdG9yZWQgc2luZ2xldG9ucyBvZiBvbmUtd2F5IGRlbGF5IGkBMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.188.663
Message-ID: <1399907354.77429.YahooMailNeo@web125106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 08:09:14 -0700
From: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
To: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/H7QoZ-m5Ks877uxN8GvGdtF5-oU
Subject: [ippm] Document Action: 'Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05.txt)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 15:09:22 -0000
Al, Some comments on draft-morton-ippm-2679-bis-04.txt: 1. The items in section 1 of RFC2679bis (delay) appear to be implemented in the draft but I am having a bit of trouble with understanding: "Further, enforcing a specific constant waiting time on stored singletons of one-way delay is compliant with this specification and may allow the results to serve more than one reporting audience." I am not finding the discussion of constant waiting time with regard to singletons. Is it in the test plan document? 2. I also had a comment on Section 3.7.2 Errors or uncertainties related to Wire-time vs Host-time I have had some discussions with folks about the idea of offloading the processing of the timestamps onto hardware. That is, performing these kind of functions on a chip. I wonder if that changes the conversation here a bit? Thanks, Nalini Elkins Inside Products, Inc. (831) 659-8360 www.insidethestack.com
- [ippm] Document Action: 'Test Plan and Results fo… The IESG
- Re: [ippm] Document Action: 'Test Plan and Result… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- [ippm] Document Action: 'Test Plan and Results fo… Nalini Elkins
- Re: [ippm] Document Action: 'Test Plan and Result… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [ippm] Document Action: 'Test Plan and Result… Ruediger.Geib
- Re: [ippm] Document Action: 'Test Plan and Result… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)