Re: [ippm] Adoption call for IOAM deployment and integrity documents

Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com> Wed, 11 August 2021 06:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C21D3A0B3C for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 23:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uoS6g_wOEZ2i for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 23:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D533A0B37 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 23:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id i10-20020a05600c354ab029025a0f317abfso3562716wmq.3 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 23:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6roEC77s//UjjwM1kfhFRmP7F9omHgTgdUrobXESiuo=; b=gIe/+VXXrUfMZFN1DYOy9eI8vw5kHN1vgj6rpvPqCaRuCBafr/65XSxNrqCe6DOEdW DRKVGTr+QSB8OcnJD922SljDAJbLPNzmNQ27CBe+sOA538sLc3Sa+5JTvd15xtRyIVCW RfxFQ6aEjlLCa5Z+H++RE2LLD8tNycVofh1xpDsfR8651FPcf6EHn63dMnA90BuLCuHB KNShiWxMVR8dn25+M9nKp6tfVaswORP8TWg/n8J2jZ8jXu/thyrQmtv1ql2yZcJR+Dar 38pmrH77x9FVXOdorzTzsc/I/vFvG1JbzrFfNgu/Iv+KCEiyon2im6h8pxJWr7IANYUi 9k0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6roEC77s//UjjwM1kfhFRmP7F9omHgTgdUrobXESiuo=; b=UN90TgIvwjSwpVkCMZLDKvtlHXJeZgOy9wBfDSyCEtDf1K73DtUYkUXzutS4bNTYu0 66uf3BeUEWP68DdaHnfBFiM+AQlKswSToy3dvtdwd4FVdIdeqcRogj1n7rSil6C3b9Tj cRSEQL+7aVF7MkuFMK5aave5extp8/WnzT84tqEWffH+5l08ZTNciVh+YdZW5AMGJrCO LPUVlEu4uziI3trqGg7u47NMqZfxwvE0zWdnP1j4E3tpy74j8WaCYGASf4eUXKkO51VS Zm8Hh1qNVPYaLWU3y5IqufOFjSMvUTKejMmb21lzTpb9srg3oIqDfl2YeGWjFPKIbNog vskA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jmK8bmxbNkP6Cm3K/ySMA8bJrGbyl4BE4zBvj5k+X5pNcXZxq OJce4YGPVCWHSZQwsUGbkkr6JSEL2BS/n79jarruV3S7iTSnlA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5eA2xLrUPnByJVKAxLwMx1taj8PVZjKiMb1zIcgMKbDLaHYtct9YEePF1428xf7n8seSuX992N4spclYtMd8=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c204:: with SMTP id x4mr25725417wmi.70.1628662329005; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 23:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <69C9F697-A970-41DD-B7EF-0C17204D57AA@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <69C9F697-A970-41DD-B7EF-0C17204D57AA@apple.com>
From: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:11:57 +0300
Message-ID: <CABUE3XkqH7cjTCt7+O1YG6fiD=Xj3R7MiJh37ATHnbgE2hcwXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/HYH0BBKQPGJ776pxfLQlY-C7AkU>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for IOAM deployment and integrity documents
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 06:12:17 -0000

I support the adoption of both drafts (as a co-author).

Both drafts have been discussed by the WG, and both have been
discussed in the IESG review of the IOAM data draft.

Cheers,
Tal.



On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:29 PM Tommy Pauly
<tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Hello IPPM,
>
> As discussed in our meeting last week, we will be starting an adoption call for two IOAM-related documents that have been raised as important dependencies during the IESG review of IOAM-data.
>
> This email begins a Working Group adoption call for two documents:
>
> Integrity of In-situ OAM Data Fields
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-ippm-ioam-data-integrity/
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-brockners-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-03.html
>
> In-situ OAM Deployment
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-opsawg-ioam-deployment/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-brockners-opsawg-ioam-deployment-03
>
> This call will last until Wednesday, August 18. Please reply to this email with your comments, and if you think these documents should be taken on by IPPM.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Ian
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm