Re: [ippm] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-06

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Fri, 03 September 2021 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D6B3A2055; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_1ZzJ1Ef63I; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8AE3A20AD; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id c8so12343360lfi.3; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g9+qh6rO8jk6XJyGNFv7QsJf7aM1qfrCiFewKInPNtI=; b=TCLVfhc041vdT7edtKawipf7C0SJ9YjpZTi+U/yw1DZHuhWMgiMeZWNWlguKTdVTX9 mf87zAJOTDLtuzLlLU98iyv26VfHROUwMYUgy2slw+wSVL/XXbOETfUZ42Zr5XozSsTW sSHOnAvElICZO+PE78BiUMIboubg6T2DP+Kfa2YdQ6w2nXdCcg9evxxHpo62CPr22UYg p2BE04KHP7LN89nq0KfhE2TZ2yLNxnn9oGUt4Hgkn3F90xAmBcwi579ekJBwf0Zv+kB3 dGPBodAzAY3WdS+OxklE8q1/2rSOmOJz1Azk1vyRkoTEQFs8JnYYAsE755aLXaPGD1Gy ni+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g9+qh6rO8jk6XJyGNFv7QsJf7aM1qfrCiFewKInPNtI=; b=HkGX1HicnR9fNyF//ZL+nku6JdAn01zdfnS5jf8DXBht/ZgiztXK7GLJY+bh9QhUgq WHCTqX8mzMaBOZJRlgZyVVRoqRcGFeR/gBiSMf0P2+oiETjN4mqhQfaIyVvJjzW4m5TX sU4LQCyzF94cckODMHwwKvgzsHrZ1no3eRf4k8ZDXX4O6S+CbtGURDC9m8Gc+m2lK20j hQ3OvhpbQcqjszeJdkynWJBxZkQAF6IVEKQGWAjR586KL6Jrq4hVQ2Co9TGiSQZtpNq+ A3tAYimb7d1dYEqqHil1Yl+s79v5AjvweAs26jdhxLy9S0WVNeX33NHPSwR8eH5rQtcF S14w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DnzcEmJpEvP5hycAz7Ia9alIRLSjltZVTg9hFHcGgJ/n9sKJX oCHhpCPFVTj0WqQ27DT45RYXTswD6ZqAGwoPYRrh+tgo
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwX488Q6jCk6Kf+3SFWZKmEatXcwdcYy0/UgR52Z/7DOR0odWQ3K3vGxsNehqoF936ocG6XwwmCXU0bVKnD5Bc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1113:: with SMTP id l19mr3171098lfg.559.1630681453747; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163068085282.8497.2281892161766368778@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163068085282.8497.2281892161766368778@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:04:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOW+2dsATKHn1VN91B1ts47war5z297n+qpVHeG+iR9faoiHKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export.all@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, tsv-art@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cae37b05cb189ce5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/IKLfI2VrQBYmBy6IVbz3t-nsALQ>
Subject: Re: [ippm] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-06
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 15:04:27 -0000

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 07:54 Colin Perkins via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
wrote:

>
> In particular, the draft mandates that rate limiting is implemented on the
> exported packets, limiting the exporting data rate to 1/N of the interface
> bandwidth (where N can be configured, but defaults to 100). This limits the
> amount of traffic that can be generated, but still appears to allow for a
> significant amplification attack where a single injected IOAM packet can
> trigger flows up to 1% of link capacity (in the default setting) from on
> path
> routers. The provision of a rate limit is therefore important, but I’m
> concerned that it’s not sufficient to prevent abuse.


[BA] That was my take as well. I like the idea of “consent” combined with a
rate limit and perhaps a “circuit breaking” mechanism in extreme cases.

>
> It may be worth considering to require the exporting mechanism to perform
> an
> authenticated handshake with the destination to which it will export data,
> to
> gain explicit consent to export the data to that destination, before
> starting
> to send exported data.  It may also be worth considering to add
> authentication
> of IOAM DEX triggers, to ensure they come from a known and trusted source,
> before acting on export requests.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tsv-art mailing list
> Tsv-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art
>