From nobody Wed Feb 24 08:11:37 2021
Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DEC3A177D;
 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:11:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=cooperw.in header.b=YoVj1AGs;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=cBrmjhTm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id y7duMh_ElecQ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [64.147.123.25])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571033A177F;
 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43])
 by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10F982B;
 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:11:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:11:28 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=
 content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=x
 eer7ZuFjd4DMIdc3lpnt0otcmRBKCiJuqqP3JKHUrw=; b=YoVj1AGsiw6lJltxX
 F+ufMPZ8urFmqNRGX2y+kZPilRfssEATVKKQaxRrU7oI6c3am2Owq4ZzWUmBStQA
 I1jVaJmaW2+hEa2n2TGr1xFFPOeYMecdVW3yMMl61qs7me3pXxYQCcLc7iKM37MJ
 BlTKYLGLfd0GEmKJ2epQWHEYUFNwpSizTpDJm6sunMAMJ+pmPBpI28BGuY+vcUNx
 9CBKaBqR/NQWNBPI3J3rpQ58cS3qQaH2d+neeU8nKO/AAzDLjZtOy22x+ymgbnEV
 /JkccAcKy4AaKi39gq763e9pS7b/HO9FnkJzJ25EyR8gf8nNmzDIV5WLUTCQNkH/
 hB8aw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=xeer7ZuFjd4DMIdc3lpnt0otcmRBKCiJuqqP3JKHU
 rw=; b=cBrmjhTmcYFeAlfZGVpdKhk5tOkN0XDIcx0rFiu6sYU3tOBuev8PRjjUg
 I1qPi4MPmRa7pm+RcpqqM36OuDhBcl/3xjPEaUGS0jbPf9j+2HeOe84MHL+tblUP
 fOXyLWEvOSBfur+k976NYmv5VgWV8HtMgjL6enJbnT0cTat9iAPe4CgFxiILEg+X
 gNehuHr3afo57ZN7UA2Q8Zvm9e5u6yEDhS62jlKVzktvXqZmfD/U2sTWn8Sok4F1
 8iJFOmlJqaSIdLjdmzF1IMyI3HBXNl4gBJxPzGlWKk/zXCRr8f6RHziV2sUFpwU5
 HtzjEedYD051+kRyW9pr1yaqr2FYA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:rno2YJnk7DpM_HvdYy6tl2ovphBOuR23TEnq2ym-NIEVclMxXqGURA>
 <xme:rno2YE3nQJ-jiEA5Vk9n3Uv6TQ04NAn119B63Yai9rt8xYF1S1oKCtHZyMX54li5z
 b8kNSarhFi6aBgM1w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeejgdekgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
 uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
 fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs
 rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuggftrfgrth
 htvghrnhepjeegiefhvddvgedvffekkefhveelleffjeefffekuedvieeftdetuddtkeef
 tedvnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppe
 dujeefrdefkedruddujedrkeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm
 pehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:rno2YPoBzhanxpxBzpIBIOh5FaXEnOqSP_KQNqIyW_PUdGqfk4vPrQ>
 <xmx:rno2YJnf2K6PZpJRUMQKQKm0IWS1IMnNHgA3mskUcS5VQOU8O5_MUQ>
 <xmx:rno2YH1uilYAkEK-VfwSfHTOE7bwjE7XQfhdH25mYEW-L5J_A92C-Q>
 <xmx:r3o2YIxhl55WtKfsJPG3u9HgGJsYcufAcT-pk_y_RezujN-sRvVbEg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.84])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3386E108005F;
 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:11:25 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF014769BD6A@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:11:24 -0500
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>,
 "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>,
 "draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method.all@ietf.org"
 <draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method.all@ietf.org>, 
 "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <228C8A3B-17F1-40DD-B4C9-432F95EB68A5@cooperw.in>
References: <161314437215.27849.15366890249325519802@ietfa.amsl.com>
 <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF014769BD6A@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>,
 Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/IamjJeR3L__VzBuNr_icHgEfeRs>
Subject: Re: [ippm] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of
 draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-05
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>,
 <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>,
 <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:11:32 -0000

Stewart, thanks for your review. Al, thanks for responding. I entered a =
No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Feb 12, 2021, at 12:04 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) =
<acm@research.att.com> wrote:
>=20
> Thanks for your review, Stewart!
>=20
> please see reply below,
> Al
>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
>> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 10:40 AM
> ...
>> Summary: A well written text ready for publication
> [acm]=20
> Thanks!
>>=20
>> Major issues: None
>>=20
>> Minor issues: None
>>=20
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 8.4.  Running Code
>>=20
>>   This section is for the benefit of the Document Shepherd's form, =
and
>>   will be deleted prior to final review.
>>=20
>> SB> I am wondering if this was supposed to be deleted before this =
review,
>> or whether you plan to keep it?
> [acm]=20
> Yes, we'll certainly delete this section before the RFC Editors see =
it. However,
> there is a lot of review yet to happen. I really don't mind if the =
IESG
> sees it in some form, but we don't want to risk endorsing one =
implementation, IIRC.
>=20
> Also, this material could move to the Doc Shepherd's form, but has not =
yet:
> 	Document Quality:
>=20
> 	Are there existing implementations of the protocol? ...
>=20
> I see that we need to update the reference in section 8.4:
> OLD
> [udpst]    AT&T, "UDP Speed Test Open Broadband project", August
>              2020, <https://github.com/BroadbandForum <TBD>>.
> NEW
> [udpst]    udpst Project Collaborators, "UDP Speed Test Open Broadband =
project",=20
>              December 2020, =
<https://github.com/BroadbandForum/obudpst>.
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

