Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Wed, 11 September 2019 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BABC120A43; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EtZ5YiLI4xup; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com (nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com [17.151.62.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699B5120A39; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8BG1eEX050900; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:03:47 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=sender : content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=20180706; bh=PhYIqou1fJK6eoL7/dWODLNdP9jMmioYDkDWW5GBtp8=; b=moAGodF80BEP3sdT168PH0RX52AfETcR7/USogpLcTvlN1XvwwnQYbR6S4q1UXRLW7kY oZVpasO6gDVfa/QZHQjD/HhcIbAO1q1mDqGB4ae7AZeY9ALcfRi2TrrjPKILsP8pxmD+ NujB+dcm8/xHGP0LYLeCDHtPJr6ph20kWi7adLAukCUqr0NtkS7O5fH91ukEVui2KK/9 FUwnnvOkyELZhvoshQ+tZlS5+elUUvm+v1RA4FJ+gFHQ5vB1gmhL71VHZXYvXV82COXJ kVHzQhC/Z2S3tAAF23+O0HOtU/3PfdBpfLbfqDGapgdFk3jWEyvasvalc0ob56xT2741 dA==
Received: from ma1-mtap-s02.corp.apple.com (ma1-mtap-s02.corp.apple.com [17.40.76.6]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com with ESMTP id 2uxutktnmm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:03:46 -0700
Received: from nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com (nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com [17.128.115.155]) by ma1-mtap-s02.corp.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190507 64bit (built May 7 2019)) with ESMTPS id <0PXO00IGTCM83P20@ma1-mtap-s02.corp.apple.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com by nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190507 64bit (built May 7 2019)) id <0PXO00I00CIK2M00@nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 159681ac17b4bf28eab1955e26a63a9c
X-Va-E-CD: bb48c2d760d9d5acb5a59acf663c18ea
X-Va-R-CD: c7fc89ff8e4d841ba012a74c99d2f8d0
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 1f2716b3-578a-44a2-8531-5eb80cb04ebc
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 159681ac17b4bf28eab1955e26a63a9c
X-V-E-CD: bb48c2d760d9d5acb5a59acf663c18ea
X-V-R-CD: c7fc89ff8e4d841ba012a74c99d2f8d0
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: d51455d8-806a-4003-ac1a-252223a594c6
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-11_08:,, signatures=0
Received: from [17.234.11.198] by nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190507 64bit (built May 7 2019)) with ESMTPSA id <0PXO00KPTCM92P50@nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: tpauly@apple.com
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.2\))
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:03:37 -0700
Cc: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags@ietf.org
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <84F834CF-492A-4767-999D-7F73B3C58300@apple.com>
References: <CA+RyBmVnkMFEQv=Hr3y9OD09+_vocHRgnGQnLwEVO=yuTcptEQ@mail.gmail.com> <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch>
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.2)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-11_08:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/KCBMVGIoCck3pspbpnR0-BMvWWg>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 16:03:50 -0000

Hello IPPM,

Thanks everyone for their input on the adoption of this draft! The chairs believe that it is the overall consensus of the group that this document should be adopted as a WG item. There were many good points and reviews raised, particularly around the loopback option. We would like to see this feedback incorporated into the draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-00 version. We can continue iterating there.

Authors, please create an updated document and submit as a WG document.

Best,
Tommy (as IPPM co-chair)

> On Jul 25, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> 
> hi Greg,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback; absolutely, we can do this the normal way. Authors: let's do a normal two-week adoption call for this document before publishing the update.
> 
> This adoption call starts now.
> 
> IPPM, please respond to this message with an indication to the mailing list of your support for adopting draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags as a working group document, in partial fulfillment of our charter milestone "submit a Standards Track draft on inband OAM based measurement methodologies to the IESG" (obviously, depending on how many documents we end up sending to the IESG, we may have to change the plurality of this milestone). If you do not support this, please send a message to the list explaining why.
> 
> Thanks, cheers,
> 
> Brian (as IPPM co-chair)
> 
> 
>> On 25 Jul 2019, at 13:15, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Chairs, et al.,
>> I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material not directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the document. The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many comments. I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to the charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Greg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm