Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Wed, 30 March 2022 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771133A1A07 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f8MLWokRFal7 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 120883A1A08 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4KSqXS6H9lzBvnwx for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:05:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4KSqWs6yVrzBFqF7; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:05:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp03.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.202]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 22U24rkY055963; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:04:53 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:04:53 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:04:53 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afb6243bac5ffffffff86f-29396
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202203301004531933619@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131ED844BD5B1A42FB128C1E21E9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: AM0PR07MB4131ED844BD5B1A42FB128C1E21E9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 22U24rkY055963
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.137.novalocal with ID 6243BAF8.001 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1648605944/4KSqXS6H9lzBvnwx/6243BAF8.001/192.168.251.13/[192.168.251.13]/mxct.zte.com.cn/<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6243BAF8.001/4KSqXS6H9lzBvnwx
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/KR0X5F8Vl9HSBxkrgBAM_WXSubQ>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 02:05:52 -0000

Hi Marcus and Tommy,

I support publication of this document as a co-author.

Best Regards,
Xiao Min
------------------原始邮件------------------
发件人:MarcusIhlar
收件人:ippm@ietf.org;
日 期 :2022年03月30日 01:04
主 题 :[ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

Hello IPPM,
This email starts the working group last call for the document draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-03
Please provide your feedback on whether you think this document is ready to progress by replying to this email by Tuesday, April 12.
Best Regards,
Marcus & Tommy