[ippm] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8972 (8339)

["Henrik Nydell (hnydell)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi
As a co-author, I also support Mohammed’s new version of the correction in this Erratum.

Regards
Henrik

From: Ernesto Ruffini <[e-mail]>
Date: Tuesday, 1 April 2025 at 18:29
To: 'Will Hawkins' <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Madison Church' <[e-mail]>, 'RFC Editor' <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: [ippm] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8972 (8339)
Hi,
As a co-author, I confirm this is an Erratum, and I support Mohamed's new version.
Thank you very much for spotting it out and managing it

        Ernesto


-----Original Message-----
From: Will Hawkins <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 14:58
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Madison Church <[e-mail]>; RFC Editor <[e-mail]>; Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8972 (8339)

That sounds good to me! I had a conversation with Greg Mirsky and he informally verified that the Errata exists. Of course, everyone is busy and I know that he probably wanted some additional time to verify. So, unless there is a rush, I am happy to spend as much time as necessary so that they can have a chance to review.

Thank you for all the work that you do!

Will

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 6:29 AM <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi Will,
>
> Thank you for filling the erratum. No need to apologize :-)
>
> Unless I'm hearing any objection by the end of this week, I'm planning to flag this as verified but with a slightly tweaked NEW:
>
> NEW:
>  The Session-Reflector MUST validate the Length value of the
> Follow-Up Telemetry TLV in that STAMP test packet.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Will Hawkins <[e-mail]>
> > Envoyé : samedi 22 mars 2025 04:09
> > À : Madison Church <[e-mail]> Cc : RFC Editor
> > <[e-mail]>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > <[e-mail]>; Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>;
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail] Objet : Re:
> > [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8972 (8339)
> >
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am terribly sorry for selecting the wrong type. I was attempting
> > to follow best practices and must have completely misinterpreted
> > guidance on how to proceed. Again, I am very sorry for causing you
> > all extra work and hope that the errata submission is helpful!
> > Will
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 4:46 PM Madison Church <[e-mail]-
> > editor.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mohamed,
> > >
> > > We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as
> > editorial, so we changed the Type to “Technical”. As Stream
> > Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see
> > the definitions at
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata-
> > definitions%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C98192
> > e8
> > 3e2a84dab0b7b08dd68eef5d7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0
> > %7
> > C638782097729329001%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUs
> > Il
> > YiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7
> > C0
> > %7C%7C%7C&sdata=JrNx5YruxUP2q8u8ea3h%2FUYPvORivFA4RY%2BWisw8u6E%3D&r
> > es
> > erved=0).
> > >
> > > You may review the report at:
> > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > > rfc-
> > editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid8339&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o
> > >
> > range.com%7C98192e83e2a84dab0b7b08dd68eef5d7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b
> > 92
> > >
> > 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638782097729340943%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFb
> > XB
> > >
> > 0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCI
> > sI
> > >
> > ldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NHuatS0WR07S5Kvoj6qXMsFRwEafcbe9%
> > 2F
> > > zKCJEpS5ps%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Information on how to verify errata reports can be found at:
> > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > > rfc-editor.org%2Fhow-to-
> > verify%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o
> > >
> > range.com%7C98192e83e2a84dab0b7b08dd68eef5d7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b
> > 92
> > >
> > 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638782097729348934%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFb
> > XB
> > >
> > 0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCI
> > sI
> > >
> > ldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=voVLruhZ%2F6NkTewom0XhXBejNtIvr8w
> > pY
> > > CwMcz2qRfk%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Further information on errata can be found at:
> > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > > rfc-
> > editor.org%2Ferrata.php&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.
> > >
> > com%7C98192e83e2a84dab0b7b08dd68eef5d7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6
> > f5
> > >
> > d20%7C0%7C0%7C638782097729356845%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1
> > hc
> > >
> > GkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUI
> > jo
> > >
> > yfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=xzKHFoWvYcpn4kuN%2Fo%2FBySHgpEOf92MkzGO
> > 7h
> > > t7leWU%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > RFC Editor/mc
> > >
> > > > On Mar 18, 2025, at 7:00 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-
> > editor.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8972,
> > "Simple
> > > > Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions".
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > > > You may review the report below and at:
> > > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> > > > w.rfc-
> > editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid8339&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair
> > > >
> > %40orange.com%7C98192e83e2a84dab0b7b08dd68eef5d7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfb
> > > >
> > c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638782097729364658%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
> > > >
> > 8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjo
> > > >
> > iTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lDKzsUWwp%2Fz4GV9B7o%2F
> > > > C39R8Xlckey9n4bA1TD2%2F4HM%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > > > Type: Editorial
> > > > Reported by: William Hawkins <[e-mail]>
> > > >
> > > > Section: 4.7
> > > >
> > > > Original Text
> > > > -------------
> > > > The Session-Reflector MUST validate the Length value of the
> > > > STAMP test packet.
> > > >
> > > > Corrected Text
> > > > --------------
> > > > The Session-Reflector MUST validate the Length value of the
> > Followup
> > > > TLV.
> > > >
> > > > Notes
> > > > -----
> > > > The STAMP protocol (and the introduction of TLV extensions) make
> > for a great tool for active network measurement. I hope that this
> > simple change helps improve the technical accuracy of the
> > coordinated set of RFCs. Thank you, authors and editors, for the
> > great work you have done!
> > > >
> > > > Instructions:
> > > > -------------
> > > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam,
> > > > it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> > > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected.
> > > > When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to
> > > > change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > > > RFC8972 (draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-10)
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > > > Title               : Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol
> > Optional Extensions
> > > > Publication Date    : January 2021
> > > > Author(s)           : G. Mirsky, X. Min, H. Nydell, R. Foote, A.
> > Masputra, E. Ruffini
> > > > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > > > Source              : IP Performance Measurement
> > > > Stream              : IETF
> > > > Verifying Party     : IESG
> > >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message
> par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]