Re: [ippm] Re-call for adoption: draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state

[Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]>]

Dear Authors

Few questions.

The solution appear to be data plane agnostic and can apply to any data
plane.  Correct?

I would add SR to list of data planes or just say that the solution is data
plane agnostic applies to all data planes.

Also the recommended feasible method of deployment is to use PCE or PCE CC
 SDN centralized controller.

In the introduction towards the bottom below is stated.

“ The IOAM encapsulating node can acquire these IOAM capabilities info from
the centralized controller, through, e.g., NETCONF/YANG, PCEP, or BGP.”

As for centralized controller do you mean to say PCE or PCE CC-CCI object
PCE/SDN centralized controller.

You may want to state that the centralized controller option is the
recommended method and reasons why.

For IGP scenario would you need an IGP extension - much more complicated,
or I guess you could use ISIS instance or OSPF transport mode to carry the
metadata.  I think it maybe better to drop the IGP scenario.

Kind Regards

Gyan

On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 11:59 AM Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear Authors
>
> I support WG adoption.
>
> This is a valuable telemetry tool in the operators toolbox for in-situ
> IOAM transit nodes data container  encap / decap within IOAM domain, with
> this extension to existing OAM echo-request/reply used in IPv6, MPLS, SFC,
> BIER, SR.
>
> Highly valuable to operators.
>
> Gyan
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:30 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tommy and Ian,
>>
>> I support the adoption of this draft (as co-author).
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Greg Mirsky
>>
>>
>> Sr. Standardization Expert
>> 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
>> Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
>>
>>
>>
>> E: [e-mail]
>> www.zte.com.cn
>> Original Mail
>> *Sender: *TommyPauly
>> *To: *IETF IPPM WG ([e-mail]);
>> *Date: *2021/07/01 09:48
>> *Subject: **[ippm] Re-call for adoption: draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state*
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>>
>> Hello IPPM,
>>
>> Back in November, we had a call for adoption
>> for draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state that led to several questions, and we
>> asked for revised drafts.
>>
>> We’ve gotten several new versions, so Ian and I would like to re-start
>> the adoption call to get people’s input on the current version.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10
>>
>> Please review the document and reply to the list to indicate if you
>> support adopting this work by *Thursday, July 15*.
>>
>> Best,
>> Tommy & Ian
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>>
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
> *Email [e-mail] <[e-mail]>*
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email [e-mail] <[e-mail]>*



*M 301 502-1347*