[ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06: (with COMMENT)
Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 25 February 2021 15:21 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45493A1B83; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:21:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, tpauly@apple.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.26.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161426647584.14166.5269938969946072865@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:21:15 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/NWSYFoirUL1qt119q6wp0R0ELBk>
Subject: [ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:21:17 -0000
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Since a SHOULD leaves an implementer with a choice, it's preferable to see prose explaining why one might deviate from the SHOULD advice. Thus, the SHOULDs in Sections 5.3 and 6.3 leave me wondering under what circumstances an implementer might legitimately choose to do something else. If there are none, should it be a MUST?
- [ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-i… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)