[ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6925)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 06 April 2022 01:49 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235383A17C4 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pvlqQDTLuMJ for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3AF83A17B3 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 3EB80E43B7; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: acmorton@att.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com, tpauly@apple.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mannyman123442@yahoo.com, ippm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220406014858.3EB80E43B7@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 18:48:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/O0VzjyskSx-t4SaCzG2SyVh5u1Q>
Subject: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6925)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 01:49:03 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6673, "Round-Trip Packet Loss Metrics". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6925 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Jesus Alvarado <mannyman123442@yahoo.com> Section: 6673 Original Text ------------- Original Text: RFC 5378 RFC 3978-incoming November 2008 Corrected Text: RFC 5378 Rights Provided to IETF Trust November 2008 Notes: Corrected Text -------------- Original Text: RFC 5378 RFC 3978-incoming November 2008 Corrected Text: RFC 5378 Rights Provided to IETF Trust November 2008 Notes: That’s contract was before media line’s Notes ----- And again if Danielle is around I am not trying to connect and we do need to talk about what I asked 2012 and you should not be forced into sex until the contract for 2015 is fixed. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6673 (draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-05) -------------------------------------- Title : Round-Trip Packet Loss Metrics Publication Date : August 2012 Author(s) : A. Morton Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Performance Measurement Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6925) RFC Errata System
- Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6… MORTON JR., AL
- Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6… t petch
- Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6… Chris Smiley