[ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6925)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 06 April 2022 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235383A17C4 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pvlqQDTLuMJ for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3AF83A17B3 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 3EB80E43B7; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: acmorton@att.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com, tpauly@apple.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mannyman123442@yahoo.com, ippm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220406014858.3EB80E43B7@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 18:48:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/O0VzjyskSx-t4SaCzG2SyVh5u1Q>
Subject: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6925)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 01:49:03 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6673,
"Round-Trip Packet Loss Metrics".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Jesus Alvarado <mannyman123442@yahoo.com>

Section: 6673

Original Text
Original Text:

RFC 5378                   RFC 3978-incoming               November 2008

Corrected Text:

RFC 5378             Rights Provided to IETF Trust         November 2008


Corrected Text
Original Text:

RFC 5378                   RFC 3978-incoming               November 2008

Corrected Text:

RFC 5378             Rights Provided to IETF Trust         November 2008

Notes: That’s contract was before media line’s 

And again if Danielle is around I am not trying to connect and we do need to talk about what I asked 2012 and you should not be forced into sex until the contract for 2015 is fixed.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC6673 (draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-05)
Title               : Round-Trip Packet Loss Metrics
Publication Date    : August 2012
Author(s)           : A. Morton
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IP Performance Measurement
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG