Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv

Giuseppe Fioccola <> Tue, 09 July 2019 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CEB120151; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2f7Qk-PqkpQj; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC810120158; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C424813B0889CDF6F262; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 13:23:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 13:23:36 +0100
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <>
To: Tommy Pauly <>, IETF IPPM WG <>
CC: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv
Thread-Index: AQHVNeAYbCMl0HBej0+P2LgCtqdHeabCNbcg
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:23:36 +0000
Message-ID: <E92F9C7E59A8854E8BED73140B879B4E01331B20@lhreml507-mbb>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E92F9C7E59A8854E8BED73140B879B4E01331B20lhreml507mbb_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:23:44 -0000

Yes, I support its adoption.


From: ippm [] On Behalf Of Tommy Pauly
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 12:47 AM
Subject: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv

Hello IPPM,

This message begins an adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv, "Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions”. The document has been discussed on the list recently, with good input and reviews from the group. We’d like to get the working group’s input on if this document should be adopted and worked on by the group.

The current status and text of the document can be found here:

Please respond to this email by Tuesday, July 23 to indicate whether or not you think IPPM should adopt and work on the extensions and extension mechanism described in this draft.

Tommy (as IPPM co-chair)