Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08
Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Sun, 28 June 2020 16:05 UTC
Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082593A0D8A; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eKJ8Aed89cza; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFF733A0DB6; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s9so15389199ljm.11; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NvJZeI/hgGK8NXItQJeJWusBVO+x33mlPJu9W/3YUAI=; b=FnNcFVLUiewJa1t4vIh8Q72D6stv1udhv7tadPky3Ut/DP037QPWnac2TctysFTcLZ /VdIltBqsjJm1+FIMFbwHSokcMolujz0JbIpLgMO5H8+mIfv6ydWZmbVjw+/99ku/jQj drW1ltBlVjBsQUvmkpB9cyOEQd4NaHk99T9RwrW+D7o9sde0N/GaGpg3MDXxRTEarTb7 En6l/+PEIlXw1avJjDOJfOYkc1gI+FF7a3iJHMDKSgjpPjaTr7gnzH7z6Ar9sLaJM1ry 4Pyw6LndREaY0tPGahlEmvKhVm/xnTS+AcgfPeMMKfgva21wYNVORB/YuWyZuAgiCuJq ud2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NvJZeI/hgGK8NXItQJeJWusBVO+x33mlPJu9W/3YUAI=; b=JKOItPRzwf5gcG/3Z8LNNIpvPJGBwAqBKSNh9rfGAd0olmu97Sy11RI4O0OYAxr0Xz ikLFzCXUKIN0VRuWlH5F4/pLOeI9ITFg5McNgnu0fUhevV698wz5kqRfSMELXLVmKZAY QdZte6QJZdk0x7vwpvT0Xoih723yB+sqc4TFhIAFGrdCkvraK52csu4dUGdfU6cdGypD 2UDwR/zHpWNwz0Ipmj/gDec+zeDGiQw2N6eo1k5YjKXjvXcd5jDtIi0UuUE1rqZi+hQW eRYl0u7U85tXzP0RrdzHSL7gSlRhmFXdjonrV07pctyQY7Vpq0xwgCwEGr4eQhoMmmus 5Vmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530j/D63c3LkVFhabWcoz5X//JzUdpeFQcFyfdQaDih1jrEWLBal T/xEG8jp45gvIHFg9J8Ms2Cxe8eLDjqWwPYTXXM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbcUn3+xv6XUnGf7jaJmMMbE5CsNGJEZWsxxqEzVtRCJHQU2OLp8ppaAY2udyibIB4XyTMYpPYzW89R/VzAl0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a16e:: with SMTP id u14mr1350767ljl.321.1593360303830; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159326696737.10306.5653213903966509356@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF0108A69B10@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF0108A69B10@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:04:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CACsn0ckcZ8Wp3oruRsBnv3r846ea0CQ4pgVKhFdQV3uXArKm+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-route.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-route.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/OzW6McGc_RP7lf2qHA-DM8TK7D8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:05:15 -0000
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 11:55 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com> wrote: <snip> > > > > > Now for the meat: what about the security considerations? Since this draft is > > describing enhancements to traceroute and ways to describe the measurements > > taken by such enhanced traceroutes, the security impact is minimal and the > > authors reference the existing RFCs describing the security impacts of > > tracroutes on networks. > [acm] > I'm looking for the action implied in your comment. Do we add the sentences: > > This draft describes enhancements to traceroute and ways to describe the measurements taken by such enhanced traceroute tools. The security impact is minimal and the authors reference the existing RFCs describing the security impacts of active and hybrid measurements on networks (of which traceroute measurements are a subset) below. My apologies: you read as a suggestion which I thought was a description. I don't think it has to change at all. > > Or? > > > > > Sincerely, > > Watson Ladd > > > -- "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains". --Rousseau.
- [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm… Watson Ladd via Datatracker
- Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Watson Ladd
- Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-… J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin