Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

Jai Kumar <> Thu, 25 July 2019 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803801201F2 for <>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DeNl3h9-GNeI for <>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D821201EF for <>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id t16so23258513pfe.11 for <>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ce9aNwxZ+oAv7du2IvEonyZdRSo5HNeNwW9PDE7UL5Y=; b=ENobd+r2vLGb7juNMqPsn+W6423H/wqj/HYuuaP5ihtlDhGt4igMXxx6yxg/d9imZf VsAvX6uCMpCDLoE+1s5sT5QlwkMITx5xRQczEmE2d53egjzEN1xGgoUY3yJnjw3Oaf6D 5P+SGNUVKFwrwRDaYX7Dyk0BCN7bXa36XKEGk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ce9aNwxZ+oAv7du2IvEonyZdRSo5HNeNwW9PDE7UL5Y=; b=AdgIVsviJ+VGJqTl9m2xmXekSSWLdR6ndZ6yW8UOmOYIuHmK32kTx/0spyC0LOCpck oxVmlcNSaMl4UaQvMfh8kaKp0UfQuzboiE4sRfFZVu/fctar544RlPrOdH8Jqm64dvv6 J/vdX2Z69DqQGm4AeLVeFV6Gq10sFwqnXt2C598CCf2d/hstTYe+s2YjkL8vJG/9CGb+ to9fzQ9uw8iYWOa1bkYVqb/1BcGOFflhWMZLM4+dNULqoDadiaRbCrzwZBr5RUB/n+YZ Q7cxI3Z7dpw8VtrOwIWfAbVauNdBQvnZR3PO6EMudYPvlfWNSjvSb2A9Za2svT/isZoI 4peg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXnbYHnU/psMPC5a5FG7hozyOWo2bTjzYzq5CpZ9gp+CAFmqzI0 f75zxSs5dsCqueWy6u7bOnxMLw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz9TH23hF9yGfxbgfxeZkJ8m9VG2FyffgEHatehfmiPKOp6iSU6XWyeyFzbhNulcdxfQIS50g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:898e:: with SMTP id v14mr94333733pjn.119.1564085361152; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) by with ESMTPSA id s7sm43636938pjn.28.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1b.0.190715
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:09:16 -0700
From: Jai Kumar <>
To: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <>, Greg Mirsky <>
CC: IPPM Chairs <>, IETF IPPM WG <>
Message-ID: <>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 20:09:25 -0000

Hello Chairs,

What is the procedure for requesting edits.

Can it happen after the adoption call or requests need to be made before.


On 7/25/19, 11:07 AM, "ippm on behalf of Brian Trammell (IETF)" < on behalf of> wrote:

    hi Greg,
    Thanks for the feedback; absolutely, we can do this the normal way. Authors: let's do a normal two-week adoption call for this document before publishing the update.
    This adoption call starts now.
    IPPM, please respond to this message with an indication to the mailing list of your support for adopting draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags as a working group document, in partial fulfillment of our charter milestone "submit a Standards Track draft on inband OAM based measurement methodologies to the IESG" (obviously, depending on how many documents we end up sending to the IESG, we may have to change the plurality of this milestone). If you do not support this, please send a message to the list explaining why.
    Thanks, cheers,
    Brian (as IPPM co-chair)
    > On 25 Jul 2019, at 13:15, Greg Mirsky <> wrote:
    > Dear Chairs, et al.,
    > I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material not directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the document. The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many comments. I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to the charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.
    > Regards,
    > Greg
    ippm mailing list