[ippm] draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data and a new draft for IOAM flags

"Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com> Thu, 04 July 2019 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <fbrockne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5A9120156 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 11:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=G8wy8yoH; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=OiBlRtez
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lpn17NZaL-Tc for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 11:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E689120077 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 11:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5368; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1562264506; x=1563474106; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=TniTKhsQPCB8PPBqMUjF2K/ljRIrKY05AcKzlH51kpI=; b=G8wy8yoHWeZT+WBVuSdMNhUZYsgI3z4UdIeMmPBEXwmmuqf6gtQdppEF R7a5wqMgmqmk7f3kwrthDykaSMRgFP1vFS1ldO0T4Jr10q43iWV6e59Xb VuIYA9SGso4a4cK+/DMXh+ttjy1zYB5c9K3n3aa+HsTKm2B03z5kZ+dWN s=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:5wSKsRNe1lhYADH4sicl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEu6w/l0fHCIPc7f8My/HbtaztQyQh2d6AqzhDFf4ETBoZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBj1JuTtZC88EexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CEAAD/Qh5d/4MNJK1lHgEGBwaBUwkLAYEUL1ADalUgBAsoCodZA45KTJUBhFSBLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBASMKAgEBhEACgiwjNAkOAQMBAQQBAQIBBW2KNwELhWMbEwEBOBEBGGgmAQQbGoMBgR1NAx0BAgybYAKBOIhggiOCeQEBBYEyAQMCAoNWGIISAwaBNAGLXheBQD+BEUaFawEBA4FGGiuDD4ImjCchhx+WYgkCgheGVo1IgUxglUyNMIEwhg+PfAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUDiBWHAVgyeCQYNxhRSFP3KBKYw4AYEgAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,451,1557187200"; d="scan'208,217";a="300045093"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Jul 2019 18:21:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com (xch-aln-018.cisco.com [173.36.7.28]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x64ILjMo009829 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:21:45 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 13:21:44 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 13:21:44 -0500
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 14:21:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4vfDAYMFYuU2pkdRBCQzyXcITz7zcWW+Heo0egqjPoo=; b=OiBlRtezZuyr5MKelQvmWp6b6qe1nd+pz3FUen4O5yJNOew9IaBu2LRfKSg+HWoOTiZIOPXpRZ7rcVvKcTypDZfGtICTKA0EHYMLf17JW+vwgSJZ8Lyw3ehrIjDyhA6SOryYUBxrkToFlhFv7q6xH2PvAFGquQQStoxT5of3cqA=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3629.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.252.31) by MN2PR11MB3696.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.253.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2032.20; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:21:42 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3629.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a0a4:d8ed:d942:86fd]) by MN2PR11MB3629.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a0a4:d8ed:d942:86fd%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2032.019; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:21:42 +0000
From: "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com>
To: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data and a new draft for IOAM flags
Thread-Index: AdUylCYVrsvRvlcmSe+4uK422z4Y9A==
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 18:21:42 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB3629C8C5084B57ABE3B67E16DAFA0@MN2PR11MB3629.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=fbrockne@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.61]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 60d79097-9ce7-42db-d477-08d700ac7723
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3696;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3696:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 5
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3696B6015DE5E395B854388CDAFA0@MN2PR11MB3696.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0088C92887
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(136003)(199004)(189003)(64756008)(66946007)(73956011)(66446008)(66476007)(236005)(2501003)(5660300002)(99286004)(71190400001)(71200400001)(2906002)(66556008)(76116006)(33656002)(14454004)(606006)(54896002)(74316002)(2351001)(9686003)(66066001)(6306002)(966005)(86362001)(476003)(6116002)(486006)(478600001)(3846002)(53936002)(8936002)(26005)(186003)(7696005)(790700001)(102836004)(6506007)(8676002)(316002)(1730700003)(81166006)(81156014)(25786009)(256004)(14444005)(7736002)(6916009)(6436002)(55016002)(68736007)(52536014)(5640700003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3696; H:MN2PR11MB3629.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 2skrcYNWUrH7+SmoPikdFKKF7pELt/Um6sI7Lv2brIfHkQ05C9fRBgmobGrXj0ClveSu9EpRjoDWDS4y8Z5zxdeCaPRz+tGmiqdTdTjBXLXj5UPW7WPumEvAXWZH+wQqk/0pqi01wjDkxJlbXcZjBrL2TFm1hEG4OO9+KlaeXnmwRSk2iBD45ZnrNjY9Pxmg3cc5itxSQ0R1k65f2fY4pkXz8FqEyvaxJ4hp5nE1jFoDLkCAEGuaFJCvsSDQiI4fJ/fgjN+Q7AcMBT0StLc3FTMzIxWkicgtVrq9Dg7bThG7+/yMnpBtKx8qOeY4ZFYjEyMVS31oQfqDKUlrAHsfxFW7PEYTR7bSrPWakKesqiSUiWgSxXeujkNF4ssBsJm2pGUm1HY1XnPpL+TiwIzkubSZOeTZ2T9WttC1wHH3I6M=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB3629C8C5084B57ABE3B67E16DAFA0MN2PR11MB3629namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 60d79097-9ce7-42db-d477-08d700ac7723
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Jul 2019 18:21:42.8476 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: fbrockne@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3696
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.28, xch-aln-018.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/Pal5FPd5NjPgbotDT2Stf1O7hMY>
Subject: [ippm] draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data and a new draft for IOAM flags
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 18:21:49 -0000

Back in the IPPM WG meeting in Prague, Tommy concluded on the discussion of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-05, that we should "separate the flag discussion into separate drafts and  then fold it into the data draft based on WG consensus." (see IPPM minutes
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/minutes-104-ippm-00). Unfortunately it took a bit longer than expected but today two new documents were published following Tommy's conclusion:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags-00
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06

draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags-00 is a new document which provides the description of those flags that describe IOAM behavior not immediately associated to updating the IOAM data fields, i.e. the new draft took the text related to flags from the draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data. draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06 is the associated update to the -05 version with the description of the flags removed.

With the -00 draft cut off still a few days away, it would be great to get comments on the split and even more so on the new ioam-flags draft, so that we could create a rev before the cut off (if required) and then try to close the discussion in Montreal.

Thanks much, Frank