[ippm] Re: IPPM adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 23 May 2024 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7644CC1D4C7B for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H_PeL4_Z_Z3g for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EE13C14CEFF for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6ab9d4061fbso1762246d6.2 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716507463; x=1717112263; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4AF2iRqRwIYe/TQlBo9d6cCuxCTHUbv30Ebl/dnXcSk=; b=bFIbWV7MecrYGs816+iscIhVK+UOgo/+u9DH/m4eBUzn3Nr7pOke/7iJQlujGPQcWW OxFgkMh/oN6Pfv3H7wZjULN/369RvhWA/9fCLRLniPsRWwdBslp36UyM3YPEIlZ5zSPc HQtCQo4cLQUeifs3GX2Gi9t9Kc0CNSxcTbzA2bXPl4xnEPK2no/OMBYcdl812GQ5J3FP H4FIkZD2MkGTi8z7GKuYuSUN8fL9hh+nxO5NWpmLjCzRRj8hFjszztebugfKeD782ute WltyzBD2SpmeiGmy39ImtkBuVSweEnO+TSW236E/Wr+bojydCWsIXVbeAkq+r4W4Bp42 AOtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716507463; x=1717112263; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=4AF2iRqRwIYe/TQlBo9d6cCuxCTHUbv30Ebl/dnXcSk=; b=lUCZRXEIHljUYdzf7vQfVQODFndxH/CDvRdxknH23PIWuuk8iD03WMNDKeN47or5A2 jU20GfFzRx2or94tPhXKaUQ+haSW9HrlepONUiPDDLQL5IHHOAnJqYVrnims/yoBDQ48 O1wfQ/FuxqLc6DZ8SjUSDzgO1MGPwDaiOjaR405Ghfc7VkihvdZhE9J2hjp3EHXfsv8S V3w0j1PfDJVmV+GD4djHWWb2wTjHGezW2bYGcwlLU7ML659HKS2XJWIhEP2tv+7jDdlZ n9HYFeTyLCwPkXtNpHwRkD3RLzjnUWlWgc2xId8j1vaCacpaSwwxz7tAAlDvHXqqMRPY 70Zg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVOhnEfDiSYyiXQlLGcBm/LXdMVUnJ/9yiuwj00s2RrPaOHitSKLamqXChqUgIA7AmZwccRXrk74fkaCZ21
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxXrMnrXlm+PRfQDx6Q9EaDc9ClrBGF19Oai9ArwO7+RYEcXPI+ 1WFEqqVRk7c0npB1Itantdh0KuH1lNPOsMO/AXOtnJaIhtYrfP4xZHTz88RvC0BefURFH+OXk/O qvPLGR4LHZHBBxZjAdogDVe4+ob6wv4U4cg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGSMxNo9G/7FyvnMw6yyit4xUNdgQkxtvX5g/rbkUPKRNia2LtuKVvNRjBkRKHD3vV8SbfkBwLzty4DFtaM5UM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:4609:b0:6aa:5595:7df7 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6abcda7c51cmr7719266d6.55.1716507463379; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DB9PR07MB8983B9EDCD816FA4F586E2EEE21F2@DB9PR07MB8983.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CABUE3Xm=eDQyoBGZhDM0NJ9upJ9NYo5wj60v1qfW9=1jyjGE6g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABUE3Xm=eDQyoBGZhDM0NJ9upJ9NYo5wj60v1qfW9=1jyjGE6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 19:37:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6ebf77s6keQnbHcpWwLVa8J2cWSsgR1Tj5DPTDJ_cq3oQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009bf39f0619278903"
Message-ID-Hash: NDCGY37BPHXLCLIOFMBEBFUJMD7LPBT3
X-Message-ID-Hash: NDCGY37BPHXLCLIOFMBEBFUJMD7LPBT3
X-MailFrom: rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ippm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] Re: IPPM adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ippm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ippm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ippm-leave@ietf.org>

Thank you Tal for your review and suggestions.

Please see replies inline with <RG>...

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:30 AM Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I support the adoption of this document. I believe this document and the
> ICMPv6
> Loopback document [1] are two aspects of the same solution, and therefore
> they are complementary.
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcb-6man-icmpv6-loopback/00/


<RG> Yes.


>
>
> There are a few issues that I believe should be addressed in the document:
>
> 1. Section 3.1 talks about "options", but does not specify which
> extension headers it refers to. I assume it refers to HBH and
> Destination options, but this should be specified. What about other
> extensions such as SRH? It would be best to define the mechanism in a
> generic way that allows the reflector to reflect the entire set of IPv6
> extension headers and options.
>
>
<RG> STAMP can carry both options.

<RG> There is an email discussion in-progress on reflecting IPv6 header

<RG> With IPv6 header, yes SRH would also be reflected.



> 2. "The Session-Reflector also MUST add the matching IPv6 option in
> the IPv6 header of the Session-Reflector test packet"
> I do not think that this is a good idea. The options on the forward
> side are not necessarily required on the reverse side. Moreover,
> this approach may cause an inflated size of the IPv6 extension on the
> reverse path. For example,
> take the IOAM incremental trace option. Every transit node increases
> its size. That means that on the reverse direction it may reach a
> prohibitively large size.
> I would suggest to drop this requirement.
>


<RG> Yes, this makes sense and this is covered in Section 5.3. But yes, the
quoted text above may need editing.



> 3. "The Session-Reflector also MUST add the matching MNA Sub-Stacks
> and Ancillary Data in the MPLS header of the Session-Reflector test
> packet"
> In addition to comment (2) above, please note that in MPLS the reverse
> path is not guaranteed to be MPLS. The reverse path may be over IP,
> for example.
> Again, I suggest to drop this requirement.
>

<RG> Same as above reply. Yes, this text needs some cleaning up.

Thanks,
Rakesh



> Cheers,
> Tal.
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 5:03 PM Marcus Ihlar
> <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello IPPM,
> >
> >
> >
> > This email starts an adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.
> This document has a normative dependency on
> draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts that was recently adopted by the IPPM
> working group.
> >
> >
> >
> > You can find the draft here:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr/
> >
> > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-00.html
> >
> >
> >
> > Please review the draft and respond to this email to indicate if you
> think IPPM should adopt this document as a working group item.
> >
> >
> >
> > This call will last for 3 weeks. Please reply by Friday, May 24.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Marcus & Tommy
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ippm mailing list
> > ippm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list -- ippm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ippm-leave@ietf.org
>