Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

[Alexander L Clemm <[e-mail]>]

I consider this a small but useful extension of established technologies 
for certain deployment scenarios (involving link aggregation groups).  I 
think this is a useful work item for the group and support adoption of 
both drafts.

--- Alex

On 9/1/2022 9:43 AM, Marcus Ihlar wrote:
>
> Hello IPPM,
>
> This email starts an adoption call in the IPPM working group 
> forthe draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag and draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag 
> documents. These documents extend STAMP, OWAMP and TWAMP to support 
> performance measurements on member links of a Link Aggregation Group.
>
> The first draft specifies an extension to STAMP and can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
>
> The second draft specifies extensions to OWAMP and TWAMP and can be 
> found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
>
> Please reply to this email by *Thursday September 15*, to indicate 
> whether you support adoption of these documents.
>
> BR
>
> Marcus & Tommy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm