IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] WGLC for STAMP Extensions

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Sat, 23 May 2020 06:14 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD80D3A0FA3 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 23:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ic-REh81yTwh for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 23:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63C83A0FA2 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 23:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 86ACC61C85A13B2D298B; Sat, 23 May 2020 14:12:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp03.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.202]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 04N6CsWs069339; Sat, 23 May 2020 14:12:54 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Sat, 23 May 2020 14:12:54 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 14:12:54 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa5ec8bee6bd6636d2
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202005231412546428871@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAKcm_gMVc88xpkOMmV7L-ybVCBzw+LhNS6Jw3=iB2gutR0ZhxA@mail.gmail.com>
References: CAKcm_gMVc88xpkOMmV7L-ybVCBzw+LhNS6Jw3=iB2gutR0ZhxA@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 04N6CsWs069339
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/R4a1sX2KdZydKh2kfcrCouYmUp0>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for STAMP Extensions
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 06:14:37 -0000

Hi Ian & Tommy,






I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.


As a co-author, I support its publication.






Best Regards,


Xiao Min









原始邮件



发件人：IanSwett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
收件人：IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>;
日 期 ：2020年05月23日 05:26
主 题 ：[ippm] WGLC for STAMP Extensions




_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm


Hi IPPM,

At our virtual interim meeting, we decided draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv was ready for last call. This email starts a two-week WGLC for this draft.

The latest version can be found here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-04

This last call will end on Monday, June 8th. Please reply to ippm@ietf.org with your reviews and comments.

Thanks,
Ian & Tommy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email