Re: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06

"Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com> Wed, 04 September 2019 05:37 UTC

Return-Path: <fbrockne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F3E12006E; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 22:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=IRetkbhd; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=oy4lJDeN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXovYDcvc2-t; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 22:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC6E120090; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 22:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1481; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1567575438; x=1568785038; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=BrXe9vHXyvPC35AOVqy28/lMqfAqITYgt8ofAUdLPnA=; b=IRetkbhdcIaNEnpG/oISm3jYcxaC7vbQvMyKbgd1IayPjFh4HJhnSFel yfCjh1rl5l1uh6j3+VjIN+iElHCwW6rVaZffZoEd9Ev+t8pHMbkFmbzsj zzQTs8JgvW1lXf1u7fBnV1T1ulrUHbE9ljuh5PCVBInj3/c7BCQ2IBIFu o=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3Agkf+2hQh4zNd1XeupfsOZc6yrtpsv++ubAcI9p?= =?us-ascii?q?oqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBNfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH1?= =?us-ascii?q?5g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOiIwBsNJV1lo13q6KkNSXs35Yg6arw=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AgAAA5TW9d/5RdJa1lGwEBAQEDAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BBwMBAQGBUwYBAQELAYFEUANtViAECyoKh14DhFKGKE2CDwyXYIEuFIEQA1Q?= =?us-ascii?q?JAQEBDAEBIwoCAQGEPwKCdyM0CQ4CAwgBAQQBAQECAQYEbYUuDIVKAQEBAQM?= =?us-ascii?q?SKAYBATgLBAIBCBEEAQEfEDIdCAEBBAESCBqDAYFqAx0BAgyeQwKBOIhhgiW?= =?us-ascii?q?CfAEBBYEyAYNPGIIWAwaBNAGLdxiBQD+BEUaCTD6Be2YCgSk6gzuCJqweCoI?= =?us-ascii?q?fhnOFCYh6gjOHNo0ngVaNd4d1kFQCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVA4gVhwFYMngkKDcoZ?= =?us-ascii?q?5g1pzgSmNEAGBIgEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,465,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="622932759"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Sep 2019 05:37:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (xch-aln-014.cisco.com [173.36.7.24]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x845b4VE023156 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 05:37:04 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 00:37:00 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 00:37:00 -0500
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 00:37:00 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=E91rJhh3EI8bGkV+fNXDzd+KjUIWXE5JO5t2wjjK7gf1+lBijucJH37q0YxGcmJYyUJwpr+InOS6n6BJypfi7T29Vmg3SEkeDw5O8zayOzpXrCXfsO3ZegtmkSHtTalZP/cb8Ay41hs0nyPhgGEq4dX1hyJ9LrZF5jY4JDBMwfpO1KykAKsjllhXx/dUUG6XipCyU07UvRVXt0x3t2N6cEVW/zKdRI7ZPahL3vN0HPh18yMBfX99CRoBko0H7k+KiOlfa8LpuqNDYuMh6YaQy0MjHtqBjWpYIje9ePa4avqqTEo/VPRZ6Y4FqnElEJQQd+OrDewk7B+skeVjW4Fl1g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BrXe9vHXyvPC35AOVqy28/lMqfAqITYgt8ofAUdLPnA=; b=c/Mri9l3jJL7OnT/kmJyLIZh+LvAF8uuwhqzgkpUzm4qCGcPHa8lgr28EhI83USy/rYxlQQ00BjHyHqkX2zagzxr8jDz/SsHUFUA7QibI0qVpWKmOY3zvCfcPwkLeoekyBWOhxDnZfQLbGsX6Pk7NtbELl9NsrG7H7qvyw2rKJWRNvcIePU9KJ33ayKPrkwWVpeK8eqgxDK8bZGAYi47tKSOuT9+aiWCUk0Fw2rVu3VFdXYGnGaDejkpV9diuQOjXjfhVPV6+fhUWKiJ7qo8Ugt1+Z2LduGheodN8mj1gzw49ka80FHP73r0uJfh0bv3oYok/rjl6HH3a2Q1C+CYtg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BrXe9vHXyvPC35AOVqy28/lMqfAqITYgt8ofAUdLPnA=; b=oy4lJDeN+bOwxzOeLUy6SmCAIshxQ3xQdfosADGyuXYjPy9ZF0jGkeQUTPZVEW5PD/uLMtUOCsP3yz4wYPvpJTK9aftMwWKO6wT86NPC5J6RhaaamctCR2ReXu7w64f3N0M/XW4dx4zypmroxZHjixPSpFLHHZj0mk/jwugCSRQ=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.227.17) by BYAPR11MB2934.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.228.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2241.13; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 05:36:59 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::99d6:433d:1f21:9955]) by BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::99d6:433d:1f21:9955%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2241.014; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 05:36:59 +0000
From: "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com>
To: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>, "draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
Thread-Index: AdVRaVuwRvhTeI2VTDyRJBkRgBuuOwAPCiFABE81OsA=
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 05:36:58 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB2584B2CFE89493F8F7B9D8A9DAB80@BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB3582D134144C09AEB4A2AFBF9AD30@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <SN6PR11MB25894B96CD73BB957EB57E33DAD20@SN6PR11MB2589.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR11MB25894B96CD73BB957EB57E33DAD20@SN6PR11MB2589.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=fbrockne@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.45]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d2952e19-1e27-4be7-47c2-08d730f9e7f1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB2934;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB2934:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB29342EA1996AD80238B049A2DAB80@BYAPR11MB2934.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 0150F3F97D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(376002)(346002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(256004)(316002)(7696005)(99286004)(33656002)(14454004)(7736002)(14444005)(74316002)(478600001)(110136005)(966005)(305945005)(229853002)(2501003)(9686003)(71190400001)(71200400001)(55016002)(25786009)(6306002)(66066001)(6436002)(53936002)(6246003)(446003)(53546011)(81156014)(81166006)(26005)(8936002)(6506007)(3846002)(6116002)(76176011)(8676002)(102836004)(476003)(486006)(11346002)(2906002)(186003)(86362001)(76116006)(66476007)(66556008)(66446008)(66946007)(52536014)(5660300002)(64756008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB2934; H:BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: dxcwRd4dEGZhhediVxOY9U/yN1EA+XbNzprNc9VchNB8ZsxUCHrnE7O2fePKjMxrHbne9QQjS1AHjnyujO+E0Q329KMTTPgvER7jYWmQ8ozlZUdj3UJoQ6Ti70n0f3IRFrqyMPA6f8tBJyJZnZensYNeAyji2QBXzh/AAVfszH1Ett2V6XCTdCsi6HQq91mVupVJqlkfO+A5jX38z+xPVChhp1+LeLewaCooQ8a8wpEkuYtp9BMP/sYXkasgiFo83yQuXPHUfIGZBKTUPd1MjfRGsDSgKImox7CDqlC2vFgG4OREdEPGCAyx9woK6QZU7bRSF/B/VM06Zas1tBkdJAJ9PQyRHTnX7CCSBkl5twkoLXM+4ekodOiQt8elze3f+3+AoxV2KmZHBlOuccKuDqZFUbD+oZ0sGcnjGOtAIH4=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d2952e19-1e27-4be7-47c2-08d730f9e7f1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Sep 2019 05:36:59.0615 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: yZOh3UU7YyD9i0fbwCZ4zoZ9Bl85gclvMzQebNhCmyx5J5ErFHiVP0Z0VIcQv0zX82+AAYOLbkTRh5/XPtMFhg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB2934
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.24, xch-aln-014.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/RbpCVYsW0a4Hp1WVY2s1HFJP7vI>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 05:37:20 -0000

Thanks again detailed comments (special thanks to Tom and Haoyu).
There is a new pull request available which reflect these comments:
https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/pull/133. Please review. 
I'm hoping to get it merged by the end of this week.

Thanks, Frank

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
> Sent: Dienstag, 13. August 2019 09:08
> To: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>om>; draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-
> data@ietf.org; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
> 
> Hi Haoyu,
> 
> Thanks for your comments. They key point you raise is consistent nomenclature
> - which we definitively need to address in the next revision. Not uncommon for a
> document with many different authors - but now is indeed the time to tidy things
> up and get the house in order.
> 
> Thanks again, Frank
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>
> > Sent: Dienstag, 13. August 2019 02:00
> > To: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
> > Subject: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
> >
> > Dear IOAM data authors and IPPM WG,
> >
> > To sync up with the latest, I reread the draft and gave it a full review.
> > Some questions, comments, and suggestions are marked in the document.
> > Hopefully this can help to tighten the draft.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Haoyu
> >