[ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Sun, 17 February 2013 21:15 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85C121F8B58; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:15:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcXeyACR7IXT; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:15:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E46621F8B49; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:15:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.40
Message-ID: <20130217211555.27012.72287.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:15:55 -0800
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:15:56 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group of the IETF. Title : Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track Author(s) : Len Ciavattone Ruediger Geib Al Morton Matthias Wieser Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2013-02-17 Abstract: This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the standards track, specifically RFC 2680 on One-way Loss Metrics. Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and implemented as intended. Two completely independent implementations have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2680. In this version, the results are presented in the R-tool output form. Beautification is future work. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680 There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc26… internet-drafts
- Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-r… MORTON JR., ALFRED (AL)