[ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Fri, 03 September 2021 15:55 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084BA3A2387 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nx0lI9MakZDr for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C866D3A2389 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id m11so7311973ioo.6 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=n3GnSRhNqSz6PHY+q3pJYZOCbl/GgEqWeg8AEPfKH+U=; b=Iu1Y9v923aP3wBUn9Pn1Nus9g8MrQiZdEjuTjFfy1NsCwBvUDp9cCvxfeOUZ0e+gUC /w7Fvaup/6h+7GNskUe5T11arqWxKSufT+YK3zIsgqlUUaMYZHbbK5IlTwvkBa6XdDrh ijRsAgpLt0SK0G79CUd0KoC1PEcrTUxK925T3TQCUsHRyKKjwTFgA+/LswZgRidOtHh8 kviO7Eolr0+B73lx2MZgx+OfOz0GlBcczdEAC1lRkLAG+oPDr/bB/w4N3TGEY4fg0B8u 30UR53ZsFnFsSfFw8Ldji0VOY5MgB6CkpcNEzmiKYYG25cpVn49k7QoxoLMtZ4UnGWTv iJhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=n3GnSRhNqSz6PHY+q3pJYZOCbl/GgEqWeg8AEPfKH+U=; b=I8l++OTeYXJ/q92C0q7bLM8wcydhPjSRnVTQibiGdcLO95x+QUlqnEFfX+xAgz4gAW utoowzEuDYTzejSfDJp5aETRg4tMQgA0bw+w1kdBZZFfP+ZEKfxV1lStec7Prb0EPfmC IIk+TDOZpy4X3iBOkMfCXFgLvxhB3sxB+wGSK+SPWl/fWqsEgV6NhzpEbGIvG+jahWBx Unv6WPSv7oFdI+xJH3C3SMp939y2PyFZzGd/Cg4oulZv0ysTaAQr/Nj0J3o8/UUj4BoA d4dJTUgki1O49zTexah7UfORzUSy3TO92uC4szDNgNf4eEQm99Ibp87Uyc3+FnyaZXc9 YwtA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FaLdaFUd4UxVSTbVelAPpaTA6MWSFu2/UKoCQC+WC6ANx2lsX 0dtdM+z/Mf8oec2Un449JLIiyEGE7BGCZe9sr6ttI48vICA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTzKNy8cXmzrTu4YwiQY2XN1oZKTwAmzPAGjMXUfrVpzLqV8yPIEw8qTw4I/fI+VUJXxbx+OkQiA3+bha0ZDw=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:c30c:: with SMTP id a12mr3674706iok.52.1630684513683; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:55:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxRP=bp7LyQZ1_B5_hcjYgFs5bFnuKm-keWp5yDS_X7Lxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002dd26105cb195380"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/RvFJZmxReMC3vLcY_oKhq8Y8DU8>
Subject: [ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 15:55:34 -0000
Hello IPPM, Last Call on the status change still has some way to run, but there is already quite a bit of resistance to doing this without a bis document. Consider this a formal invitation to get the process started. A bis document should eliminate both experiment-related boilerplate, and any bits of the design that we don't feel are mature enough for Proposed Standard. Submit a -00! Thanks Martin
- [ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis Martin Duke
- Re: [ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis tom petch
- Re: [ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis tom petch
- Re: [ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis tom petch
- Re: [ippm] RFC8321bis and 8889bis Giuseppe Fioccola