Re: [ippm] Calls for adoption as WG items

<Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de> Wed, 02 July 2014 11:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560E31B2901 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 04:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XYBZmP598PRM for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 04:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail23.telekom.de (tcmail23.telekom.de [80.149.113.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F1C1B28FE for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 04:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he111628.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.93.20]) by tcmail21.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 02 Jul 2014 13:02:22 +0200
Received: from HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM ([10.134.93.12]) by HE111628.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:02:21 +0200
From: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de
To: ietf@trammell.ch
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:02:20 +0200
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Calls for adoption as WG items
Thread-Index: Ac+V2kqMzxN944jpTsSJcVMgKQx5EAACnudA
Message-ID: <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F502D8A7FF70@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM>
References: <20140529194155.17884.67924.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <47EC9EAE-25A9-4E0F-B5F9-10593A4DDD0C@trammell.ch> <CD6C53A6-9219-48E9-A03E-69E6786F4FAE@trammell.ch> <017EE38A-2B06-429F-AAC9-27F45932AD5C@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <017EE38A-2B06-429F-AAC9-27F45932AD5C@trammell.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/T_WEqP2wJ_f5w4b3hyEtThZInsQ
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ippm] Calls for adoption as WG items
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:02:49 -0000

Hi Brian,

I support adopting these new milestones.

Regards, Ruediger

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Brian Trammell
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 11:30
An: ippm@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [ippm] Calls for adoption as WG items

Greetings, IPPM,

A gentle reminder: We would like very much to have discussion on adoption completed before the Toronto meeting, so we can spend face to face time on the documents themselves. And we cannot adopt drafts as Working Group items for which there is not a strong demonstration of support and commitment to read, review, and improve the drafts.

So, please see last week's call for adoption notice, consider whether you support adoption of the named drafts, and whether you can commit to review them.

The deadline for this call for adoption is, as before, end of day Thursday 10 July 2014.

Many thanks and best regards,

Brian Trammell, as co-chair.

On 24 Jun 2014, at 16:17, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:

> Greetings, IPPM,
> 
> This is a call for adoption for four new milestones under the current IPPM charter.
> 
> (1) Submit a draft updating RFC2679 based on testing and implementation 
>    experience (RFC 6808) to the IESG as Proposed Standard  (under 
> consideration for this milestone is draft-morton-ippm-2679-bis-04)
> 
> (2) Submit a draft updating RFC2680 based on testing and implementation 
>    experience (draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05) to the IESG as 
>    Proposed Standard
>  (under consideration for this milestone is 
> draft-morton-ippm-2679-bis-04)
> 
> (3) Submit a draft adding DSCP and ECN monitoring to TWAMP to the 
>    IESG as Proposed Standard
>  (under consideration for this milestone is 
> draft-hedin-ippm-type-p-monitor-03)
> 
> (4) Submit a draft adding a UDP Checksum Trailer to OWAMP and TWAMP to the IESG 
>    as Informational
>  (under consideration for this milestone is 
> draft-mizrahi-ippm-checksum-trailer-00)
> 
> For each draft, please indicate the following to the list at 
> ippm@ietf.org
> 
> (a) whether you support the addition of the milestone and the adoption 
> of the draft as a WG item to fulfill that milestone
> (b) whether you have read the draft
> (c) whether you pledge to review the draft during the WG process.
> 
> This call for adoption will last until Thursday 10 July 2014.
> 
> Many thanks, best regards,
> 
> Brian
> 
> On 02 Jun 2014, at 18:07, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> 
>> Greetings, IPPM,
>> 
>> Thanks and congratulations to the authors on the approval of our first draft from the "new" (March 2013) charter!
>> 
>> As we're moving forward in our charter, it's time to consider adopting new drafts.
>> 
>> I've seen implicit requests for a call for adoption for the following two drafts, which were not adopted in Orlando because we wanted to see if 2330-update would change their scope significantly:
>> 
>> draft-morton-ippm-2679-bis-04
>> draft-morton-ippm-2680-bis-02
>> 
>> We have at least one explicit request for a call for adoption:
>> 
>> draft-hedin-ippm-type-p-monitor-03
>> 
>> If there are other documents which you would like to have considered for adoption as IPPM WG items in the next round under the present charter, please notify the chairs at ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org by Friday, June 6th; we'll run the call for adoption after that.
>> 
>> Thanks, cheers,
>> 
>> Brian (as chair)
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
>>> Subject: Document Action: 'Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework 
>>> for IPPM' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05.txt)
>>> Date: 29 May 2014 21:41:55 GMT+2
>>> Resent-To: bill@wjcerveny.com, ietf@trammell.ch,
>>> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
>>> Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ippm mailing list 
>>> <ippm@ietf.org>, ippm chair <ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
>>> 
>>> The IESG has approved the following document:
>>> - 'Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM'
>>> (draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05.txt) as Informational RFC
>>> 
>>> This document is the product of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group.
>>> 
>>> The IESG contact persons are Spencer Dawkins and Martin Stiemerling.
>>> 
>>> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Technical Summary
>>> 
>>> To obtain repeatable results in modern networks, test descriptions 
>>> need an expanded stream parameter framework that also augments 
>>> aspects specified as Type-P for test packets.  This memo updates the 
>>> IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Framework, RFC 2330, with advanced 
>>> considerations for measurement methodology and testing.
>>> The existing framework mostly assumes deterministic connectivity, 
>>> and that a single test stream will represent the characteristics of 
>>> the path when it is aggregated with other flows.  Networks have 
>>> evolved and test stream descriptions must evolve with them, 
>>> otherwise unexpected network features may dominate the measured performance.
>>> This memo describes new stream parameters for both network 
>>> characterization and support of application design using IPPM metrics.
>>> 
>>> Working Group Summary
>>> 
>>> This draft was first introduced to the working group in October 2012. 
>>> Support for the draft was indicated at meetings with no dissent.
>>> 
>>> Document Quality
>>> 
>>> As an update to the IPPM Framework, this document adds new and 
>>> updated considerations for stream parameters.
>>> 
>>> The document shepherd reviewed the document as a "-02" 
>>> draft and reviewed the changes which constitute "-03" and "-04".
>>> 
>>> As documented, other topics in the IPPM Framework which might be 
>>> updated or augmented are deferred to future work.  This includes the 
>>> topics of passive and various forms of of hybrid active/passive 
>>> measurements.
>>> 
>>> Personnel
>>> 
>>> The document shepherd was Bill Cerveny. The responsible area 
>>> director is Spencer Dawkins.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> ippm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm