IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 13 April 2021 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD71E3A0BF0 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e69Tt_drpnlc for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 893093A0BF6 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u4so17643791ljo.6 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+kakqQKdQ7rNHPfO51iAW2+CGcgGn9DQk8tNzuX5BO0=; b=tVxGLUj69dy+dkM5ZcgVQQYlkkLWKzVUdboM6fmLl1PC6MH3uyDRKbZwbtKrkH8IK/ iZsPWY7GX3JmZVI6OrljUtzsGJAEXBjN5xqJFKecgbagUpCaUxfvwfIjqr9ovjGYL5at wMz3//D/UI8rR/Ry11wfQ9LpAMqgBPz2GR1/Xl43IIR1a1ZBf8JPQf72gMpZUqZTwDzU lKNtojcrAnmHYrj+JMtohDqAZ/KVwX47zouOQmdtx9KzgWlFnhxfv1Qb4xrfJuoT3O6U m3q/8P92q6hanpijMT4TM+/HV4oB19muqdIUwhQ81cDfXn5asBLEQalCSVSgHQ1jPG67 RDYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+kakqQKdQ7rNHPfO51iAW2+CGcgGn9DQk8tNzuX5BO0=; b=FoVRTbwKNNANdo5fn18Oye1jsNLZVwQ2n9Dw77r0NfgrRu5P7ukA7dbMff3qYJWtNr soRwVLUn2qAplyLjDZQ5O4bcBnJ6KheaL7eadUx2ITapNefelvghKHj0NeC/gVwCCYj0 wJHz7jGo/q9DIOX+cjLBl1QkEHijkYxtOqXXaekSio++Xqu4zWkPxIAB3P+iy+jwUHfv Zi6o4PYGfpW1X8/NvWYHiHiFzMPGb/zivU8Y8QIKR7dmlu/2h+wV3/SUO2Hb3yPAfFUa VwmlRsLMyFrhN9Hat9h7HstWMzuL9gqEpnciz9H9Qlc6+/7ZFBaFsXfdUBaCpnnpvGQD nAEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309UkGSRuNEoFpinRqdLd1MdUANRX0+mAc9V+YHcItBTXY2KF9g Pp8L58nIeYdjqjVPaMN2KVIJGEj+j10kd9jFqRgXx+wN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAMHfHOR39nOYuMwFCt/GshEpyVwnOxWeaMviYlwTeeTmQsjnfamwHeTh4Z402o9XP+LnnkFaOgI53YLkWMec=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8118:: with SMTP id d24mr19090405ljg.133.1618279634349; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0B497121-1EA9-4963-8F0C-7F55502447FE@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <0B497121-1EA9-4963-8F0C-7F55502447FE@apple.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:07:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVJ6=_56XLvvvWVBf7FuWLvxK_+1dr560Y8BvotdSToBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c0b3da05bfd116c1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/URPb8HmKXk2vSvNvA5bICBmunSg>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:07:26 -0000

Dear All,
I've followed the discussion and read the latest version of the draft. I
believe that all updates are clear and support the publication of the
current version of the document.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 4:05 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello IPPM,
>
> This email starts a short re-working group last call for the revisions to
> draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method. During IESG review, there were
> several DISCUSS positions that led to refinements in the document.
>
> The current version, -09, can be found here:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
>
> You can find a diff between -06 and -09 here:
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06&url2=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
>
> I’d suggest focusing your reviews on these changes.
>
> Please provide feedback on whether or not you believe these changes are
> ready for re-publication to the IESG by *Monday, April 26*.
>
> Best,
> Tommy
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email