Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-03
Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Mon, 22 May 2023 14:09 UTC
Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9835FC1519B0; Mon, 22 May 2023 07:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqIJcxu2RF6H; Mon, 22 May 2023 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A3EC151082; Mon, 22 May 2023 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frapeml100007.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QPzn92c44z686Cc; Mon, 22 May 2023 22:08:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.219) by frapeml100007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.133) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.23; Mon, 22 May 2023 16:09:29 +0200
Received: from frapeml500006.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.219]) by frapeml500006.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.219]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.023; Mon, 22 May 2023 16:09:29 +0200
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Steve Hanna <steve@hannas.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements.all@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-03
Thread-Index: AQHZi8919IT90AmzH0azmQO6k3Sub69mVPdg
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 14:09:29 +0000
Message-ID: <1673f83daba9479f93c74e99aa844741@huawei.com>
References: <168466510290.24481.1051580668212902177@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <168466510290.24481.1051580668212902177@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.203.246.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/UWcYcpQ5chytcjwgbSZSRADzwwE>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-03
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 14:09:34 -0000
Hi Steve, Thanks for your review. Regards, Giuseppe -----Original Message----- From: Steve Hanna via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2023 12:32 PM To: secdir@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements.all@ietf.org; ippm@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-03 Reviewer: Steve Hanna Review result: Ready The security considerations described in the draft seem to be accurate and adequate. The protections are commensurate with the relatively low level of risk. By considering a wide variety of attacks and suggesting specific protections against them, the draft authors are setting a good example for others.
- [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm… Steve Hanna via Datatracker
- Re: [ippm] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Giuseppe Fioccola