Re: [ippm] [IPv6] [mpls] [Detnet] IOAM, iOAM, and oOAM abbreviations

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 18 December 2023 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E4BC14F60D; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 02:24:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GYfEooMIiAQX; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 02:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20F16C14F5EC; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 02:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5534d8fcf7bso806007a12.3; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 02:24:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1702895042; x=1703499842; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TE+0TD2OYjP31C7e/3dChMupTDoNnQabW+uIASMMkKs=; b=iaPKTJPfyMAt0ve0kDf07qyZbQdNGcU+3crNeWbI/IDIh7AI7agaB+yJXIWxT06546 TEjyNdAib4LA6HKsK7pZmKMELVaPhlRbGDrm3rnGKxC99BuxFgw/nj3HYgAE8xILgzjp LjDKerGrdqFGTvHnRkWUvY1ikXygsR+esmW+u1HIHBCmEkOVqGm4WhbbgKxOLXWM6FFK dc0G7NbCECEK5ZOG+tFcW8UOIWKbAouCaVRLu83KdNsEjy7r7lkDRB6075hoQ1lixGyq dNXVSdHlbA/tYBqrA7+nvnP2bk9niONIi16mFlnDuxncfkDReWoPgV6I0MJSfCqXDAyz AgOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702895042; x=1703499842; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TE+0TD2OYjP31C7e/3dChMupTDoNnQabW+uIASMMkKs=; b=oXGvZASaaX+yXtinTqCXjcJBobeiwXLDt6sR4e9or+IQsE7yKwerTP4xprzyS1WWNL aJxML1iPOPSvuRtf1F+25wHNkIuTNo3dUyUXzh186/Z85OtqH2oSt6TGrRBBeP1/FVMj nOLT1PSB84Ut+nWSibHzNt9XjCNWF25Vp0MAfFC6TX3CodJINtNI3zUAZT/80jOH9Lbk AJXhowNBIQptGmqhVUcE+PwOKFyspdJKVkQmbRUStfGbiBoc+pLO+UTUv4/mFiXQJGOb F18D7xE/nQcSj0OS/cQE1wOJleDQaNrAsN3BNPwmVDXxyFIZm74t3H0YU+Ewq1dBhkgw if4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyKfQa+Y9AJXMrGcD6kD1oEQaFVGLVI61nRRmbO8xyk2cy12Kiy tatOYf5lplBOjz8bNsY5piM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG9bh6rFr8rGAs6kN1NSI8s+i3YTlkz6i7yGWq5JjZcncTLyWJmOmoW3ldBSl+XhU9taru52Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ac7:b0:a18:7b92:d8b9 with SMTP id z7-20020a1709060ac700b00a187b92d8b9mr7178741ejf.38.1702895042339; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 02:24:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([148.252.140.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ry9-20020a1709068d8900b00a1f7470ba93sm13164651ejc.200.2023.12.18.02.24.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Dec 2023 02:24:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <892FE39D-9BF5-45E2-BE98-C196597DA2CD@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_01CA9CC6-0D71-45F3-A75A-EB56E3466306"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.100.2.1.4\))
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:23:50 +0000
In-Reply-To: <017501da3008$fcf69120$f6e3b360$@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, xiong.quan@zte.com.cn, gregimirsky@gmail.com, mpls@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <202312141056289511089@zte.com.cn> <017501da3008$fcf69120$f6e3b360$@olddog.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.100.2.1.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/UbN3KA9_yagNt-PRYMkZzPkKGOI>
Subject: Re: [ippm] [IPv6] [mpls] [Detnet] IOAM, iOAM, and oOAM abbreviations
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:24:09 -0000


> On 16 Dec 2023, at 10:16, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Personally, I don’t get the value of “inb-OAM” compared with “in-band OAM”. It’s not like it can be said faster (one additional syllable to say it) and it only saves four characters in typing.
> “oob-OAM” is also marginal. Same number of syllables to say (I don’t think anyone pronounces “oob” as a single syllable), and a little more saving in typing.

+ 1 

Stewart