[ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Sat, 19 October 2013 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3794911E828D; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XPCAj9wg7S1R; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69D911E827B; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20131019194754.9630.50753.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:47:54 -0700
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:47:55 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track
	Author(s)       : Len Ciavattone
                          Ruediger Geib
                          Al Morton
                          Matthias Wieser
	Filename        : draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04.txt
	Pages           : 27
	Date            : 2013-10-19

Abstract:
   This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the
   standards track, specifically RFC 2680 on One-way Loss Metrics.
   Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the
   primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo
   describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement
   clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and
   implemented as intended.  Two completely independent implementations
   have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2680.



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/