Re: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 02 September 2022 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38946C14CF14 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 08:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kGpecjIQPTpS for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 08:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A81A9C14CF09 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 08:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id bt10so3896399lfb.1 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qSTn+y3uT5anA+yVZwrOxA6/foMYjdq2ZtmLPl1PbLk=; b=YrA2U9MtAJU8rekE6xWz9UWtFakwYqCl2s5eJ2MvvGFInJFgAP85le15yCd5woHbjB LzAiIVg0x9ixkNfvTEwQ+Ufz5bL2dFoEAiQzgBaDx8LxdgfFmOuub3+XvjBg02cTpw6l LadjWTV+WAqDETyoIHG2KYSrPuPpE3CcNLpP2i1mzdZYLkbz0F+NGiN5gdA2FmkZrL0+ 9i+cBa7plODt3H+LMWlw5vwlQe+SqcThyAPW7LAVh+H/LU0g4BfDNrirrhPEJ40X2tFH IWdwTGtvFDw5cLbRndDmR/vyH1OVMps6K1KA2DFHhOukxIUAxIaiwlrgdr5ndt59uSKr Fn6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qSTn+y3uT5anA+yVZwrOxA6/foMYjdq2ZtmLPl1PbLk=; b=hUTXt7O9VMrguNwmhiEQ2UZN9vOTRkt7ObAZYsxvoLgZbilJUZLqHRuQQIIInqEMA7 DySCAPbki2PB1Z24tURRDJBUojHyE3p+WwMcseiOro5ThDh9aZ8xgWNcIxoFijh+vc+L 3aRyqpTX/4+YZqm9TG67n0gFEwfpqcitf5Mn4IC6P9kJbzLgsKwU9n3l5aCSoGUMRex9 YzM1cEdzX2QnOqfpL6yv7wwZ4onhJQFHCH+0+Zrw+OIciZ1PbMUB+rjAHepQroBGGi1N 9GEejsnBpMBhkrneXPFV2cNRREJLgL+TFD6iM0BZTALao0DMpXoQ/CnbaSawxYjKASrs 9S9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1evlVb7ZXKOznUU001VWS49BdC0m78wYqleSlxyUliHddS3Por 6uuhnbi9tTun/ZCwu75hKfqwbD+X7vLeoYmGBtDbO0dm
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4EEahNfmX9lv7hPwNzOqgqdSMh7Zi2jEV6mhgSHAH7na1NTf6b4C4CypilzzeliFqx7WX2pc4PadAxE3Fxk3Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:32c5:b0:48b:fa9f:a98f with SMTP id f5-20020a05651232c500b0048bfa9fa98fmr11725229lfg.335.1662133494886; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1BCD27D1-4A44-4FF1-BD91-C6B78F0F03A3@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <1BCD27D1-4A44-4FF1-BD91-C6B78F0F03A3@apple.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:44:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUV9F-ybNVxe-FTDqxaJqwAahTWBdYd-rQ-z+D2fRXPPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008839f905e7b39c99"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/Uw95nEt19szLNNkYUHETghHvmeA>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 15:44:57 -0000

Dear Tommy, Marcus et al.,
as the co-author, I support the IPPM WG adopting this work.
As you recall, this draft is the result of merging two proposals that were
presented and discussed over several IETF meetings. Over the course of
these discussions, we've addressed exceptionally helpful comments from Med
and Adrian. Their comments helped to clarify several aspects further. I
hope that the WG agrees that the draft addresses an important problem and
already presents a solid foundation for the solution.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 10:26 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello IPPM,
>
> As discussed at IETF 114, we’re starting an adoption call for Precision
> Availability Metrics for SLO-Governed End-to-End Services,
> draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam/
>
> The current version is here:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam-02.html
>
> Please reply to this email by *Thursday, September 15*, to indicate
> whether you support adoption of this draft.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Marcus
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>