[ippm] Re: IPPM adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 23 May 2024 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194E2C14F73E for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TbdpsxK91FwL for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1132.google.com (mail-yw1-x1132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49DE9C180B4D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1132.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-627f46fbe14so20820267b3.2 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716507568; x=1717112368; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ujk0Y/WpI6GErg9gWCdx7g7Lka2qnsUjmJb0REA11kY=; b=mUjQly0GqnokoTQgZM66h/+czEphH2AByKNt4j9Oceq1/dtgBlGu2nzjbwMl/xVKWu kDcrr+nkhjG1/29uJXfuYkJxhuXPZ5KcB6WOf9pVOcrrnwrg7DJK74Gp2Gt8VzGjnqDm q9R5Meu8xH3RP6uBeA4B3Wp5UYt7vbrWnbUlt/1/tU0kCN4axXFip3cou3Ql/EtkI6Y6 T7P+P2sWpFtr7LvmpTueak3PCA6/S+a8yaKzJhxI9YpFcovMdwc78Jy4EOkKbn8MV5S2 fB9dNE4CUDkDpLEazDqHladmhEYg4+hFENLTtFcXQAXpqh58aZANANliM3jhm/6kmqQ2 wz5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716507568; x=1717112368; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Ujk0Y/WpI6GErg9gWCdx7g7Lka2qnsUjmJb0REA11kY=; b=oyv4n5PvCG4BXNIIPO20fzZ7wGtkhLBOK7pZFka4Kq3c5fWeqBTVycInYHUso3xOWQ qIXAa07OE2ZtLyTN9B0YD/FQxGoPE9xUfbDwHMrxJnXSF96V6XGks2wZq/yYhUx1U0wN KqF6mhd1EWTpKACa7LIAY12I85kVq4mfw3L8IPSpAqu3ovrdsWlSQzCVvOZ7VFhy8G2R oJK4z6wvuPF2klO07JacGiW7hN5kslsVS1iYXlwz30WQXNNZ1JAEYTTPBvEpaUYXNTh8 g5W3V85JCHuAgQVtviPJWumerCR2v6pFTzz1ot2xOSEwcEfn3HPyIAvjTVdQlpBNNwQF iNTw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWSIrIH/I9rWmBf6t8oPlyzr7lqAwSEY6dvmrIW/QtqNd8yG3p8ltYje8sEuc/E28PMZrIE3oldrYybo58G
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzTIG16MzAr3PE+1xm+WKDOY/fvBIzbsMvSfiz71V4GNVPnWW/X C2xJc6AILwtyVknaETKBkfh1bK78g42sT6JTBKQ74nfbtOqf7JuLIKbZnWSxI/a3a8PKykoM6Kq DHkBB3UJ3qkwX3KpQTmERREyLazI5VUlM1Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGVc49iKz+PY9lDHVxG7lCv9AWC/cUqS3zHwVkorMicVUiNI60ZiQA8Oi4sxxZ0xmFqqhdyhQvQ8X1GUH/gAqs=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d0d2:0:b0:df4:ba84:6ad3 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-df7722055bamr811895276.61.1716507568129; Thu, 23 May 2024 16:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DB9PR07MB8983B9EDCD816FA4F586E2EEE21F2@DB9PR07MB8983.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <a4998699c4264534ab39f28171f16b1f@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <a4998699c4264534ab39f28171f16b1f@huawei.com>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 19:39:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6c+qrB-Zoq5dQHdANA-ebk7uwxcCjdmNSH=bJ-bn2kp-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cheng Li <c.l=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da4fa50619278fc6"
Message-ID-Hash: BGTJ724OIQ6XT7I7M63YWEEMMHL4JFZA
X-Message-ID-Hash: BGTJ724OIQ6XT7I7M63YWEEMMHL4JFZA
X-MailFrom: rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ippm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] Re: IPPM adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ippm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ippm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ippm-leave@ietf.org>

Thank you Cheng for your review and suggestions.

We will address them in the next update.

RFC 9197 defines E2E as Edge to Edge.

Thanks,
Rakesh



On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 8:35 AM Cheng Li <c.l=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> This is a simple, useful and clear document , I support the adoption.
>
> I may recommend to remove all references in the abstract, though they are
> not hyper-link in the document now. We can explain them in the introduction
> section.
>
> Also, in the terms section.
>
>    - Is E2E standing for Edge-To-Edge? Or End-to-End?
>    - Do we need MPLS: Multiprotocol Label Switching? We may delete it
>    because this is well-known. But I am ok with keeping it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cheng
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Marcus Ihlar
> *Sent:* Friday, May 3, 2024 4:03 PM
> *To:* IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [ippm] IPPM adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr
>
>
>
> Hello IPPM,
>
>
>
> This email starts an adoption call for draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.
> This document has a normative dependency on
> draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts that was recently adopted by the IPPM
> working group.
>
>
>
> You can find the draft here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr/
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-00.html
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and respond to this email to indicate if you think
> IPPM should adopt this document as a working group item.
>
>
>
> This call will last for 3 weeks. Please reply by *Friday**, May 24*.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Marcus & Tommy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list -- ippm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ippm-leave@ietf.org
>