From nobody Fri Sep 2 13:54:09 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7510EC15256B for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.903 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1gB0fix9A-CE for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 13:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D93C152567 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 13:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.0.44] ([73.189.160.186]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LyWpM-1pQ11M1Phm-015rQN for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 22:54:06 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------ilaW70j1tSEV0xmYL08BGHNq" Message-ID: <448c3166-1eab-aea2-e85f-4cc91940b533@clemm.org> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 13:54:05 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0 Content-Language: en-US To: ippm@ietf.org References: <1BCD27D1-4A44-4FF1-BD91-C6B78F0F03A3@apple.com> From: Alexander L Clemm In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:7nYXGjrU8RlB41xrHEArLbJ2AGUwV8cvgA7J8z0mVL6ITB0kB15 aoPaAeGuTx8ZaMz8BedNeJ3b0C4Kygq3jAdXnPWiAdqqitOYu00cRuCimcvLV86vrrjAh3v HMXVWmLBICtf6f/fFRJnDvy58YRa5QF7VMHL989cZJcXCF5PMSd+0WpseNW1I7DUuI+P4AJ 0rcLz2CsW8S9iaL6EMvvg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:QPI6IZ2Im74=:M2n6JICjT785rALmkXcDpW k6mQ3uoAOB1/bCb2okl0rXE4PyXJuxjubd97PKIrQwA2ZB3t8wB+6oLm8EgUtQibQ3zeAQ0HH nY1FGfnD2r1eIS4DUTKWnlL3rns93qjVYdv4rNH56eKAkZtBvTTvtcNtg/ThZ8lT4HSD1I1Dg jxE5I3OWgJm/ZD1rn14ZMk+npjNZM2d70vzY7Yxxer+9XMDM5Y1iyChj+M3KKB3zzQ6Up8sx/ T/feKxdBu2ajT1Vzt4cpqx4MJ+jLCLnv/qhXjA5Hk4wH+WqUNSO0+erB/iVUcP11D8Kqz3s+Y mA+8ysfcpjTLwyFMq24dO3lCPc9OMYpdJc6enfoLfvhFZ21+D90MVo9Ik0YgiqUavfyfj1oLt 3J0dFMNStVATBY7NmZ9mZ4dy2gd3H4NEfeP5CnY7+IWNykXZhyPuSGmUwGqDEsdIDorPLciW5 lx89eO50yQ/LwP3OZ9s1CvjEvUjUAdY3cuGAsqSp2xOiR8uJPvSoCM1wYM9ot/nDo9RWClKIp gfI1afCWCJlWzbEd865ufo7aWt/yybPzoJCwMTYzMSiSlIHYVMwVcrXGPcbCMF3/og9SoQsL/ beDd0+NHjuJLdaMeeaC84WYnAGgWhPQ/z7N0ZbgIUO5l5teAEJ+cLjn+g5O+WL7TI1rdQRg73 Itp/90k7Lu+Tzj3dmRy60VIWr/vf4yS3M3ahKe7Ti/YafRkzoYpL2dZYdnsoMPboa2TRkv0Tf Jai22qfWj+QdNJ/8sQK0JFFFiAs9D/VLXDrBKuFZANf/PIqYYR6NuQclf7Obvu31ymDV6ierH rgX7q04 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 20:54:08 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------ilaW70j1tSEV0xmYL08BGHNq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Dear Tommy, Marcus, all, +1 to Greg's eloquent explanation. As a coauthor, I support the IPPM WG adopting this draft. --- Alex On 9/2/2022 8:44 AM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > Dear Tommy, Marcus et al., > as the co-author, I support the IPPM WG adopting this work. > As you recall, this draft is the result of merging two proposals that > were presented and discussed over several IETF meetings. Over the > course of these discussions, we've addressed exceptionally helpful > comments from Med and Adrian. Their comments helped to clarify several > aspects further. I hope that the WG agrees that the draft addresses an > important problem and already presents a solid foundation for the > solution. > > Regards, > Greg > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 10:26 AM Tommy Pauly > wrote: > > Hello IPPM, > > As discussed at IETF 114, we’re starting an adoption call for > Precision Availability Metrics for SLO-Governed End-to-End > Services, draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam/ > > The current version is here: > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam-02.html > > Please reply to this email by *Thursday, September 15*, to > indicate whether you support adoption of this draft. > > Best, > Tommy & Marcus > > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm > > > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm --------------ilaW70j1tSEV0xmYL08BGHNq Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear Tommy, Marcus, all,

+1 to Greg's eloquent explanation. 

As a coauthor, I support the IPPM WG adopting this draft. 

--- Alex

On 9/2/2022 8:44 AM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
Dear Tommy, Marcus et al.,
as the co-author, I support the IPPM WG adopting this work.
As you recall, this draft is the result of merging two proposals that were presented and discussed over several IETF meetings. Over the course of these discussions, we've addressed exceptionally helpful comments from Med and Adrian. Their comments helped to clarify several aspects further. I hope that the WG agrees that the draft addresses an important problem and already presents a solid foundation for the solution.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 10:26 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
Hello IPPM,

As discussed at IETF 114, we’re starting an adoption call for Precision Availability Metrics for SLO-Governed End-to-End Services, draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam.


The current version is here:


Please reply to this email by Thursday, September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of this draft.

Best,
Tommy & Marcus

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
--------------ilaW70j1tSEV0xmYL08BGHNq--