IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 03 November 2020 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0A53A0D9D; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:34:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u8Rr7BLtcdG7; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C4843A0A85; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id k25so19728664lji.9; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 08:34:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=T14MbLkhf8tJ1cvQz3bdQhX2r+xYK1B4zOTpWW6adgo=; b=hzCQxzNRhYCkg+HyjfKNi5s+M9HPkCwSsgP5mq26X1VQdVr1rsdPt1z43RY/WXbh/P k3zQWZY58+KKysnVxtjnyhHLJoDRGxR6hx47h0BqCZ8IbrwKprQq1M9SZxfDjGUkCVMR xE869CZYKGyIwtfY/78JHZbOPXcgzNycaCUdDPzdhO07xFswrY0pqa/Gd0IWye/V6Rir KunDzxUeYNWMIKlmEOi2SPV/n+pJ50M/qdfAZEH17FPKWzdcZlVrHhikdZHomVd4n+Wj +oqRNJfUCAe72BnVUTAdpPAzsr98vMsar8FeDBbZudw+tqud0ZezvNQp4+VZCdfWR0Yu N2XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T14MbLkhf8tJ1cvQz3bdQhX2r+xYK1B4zOTpWW6adgo=; b=IZ5w+m8dtQFL9kGkiV+ZMUHurS8h6OmFpBaYVnIqpEOq9Eo0bTxQ9oDSXB/M/SRrUY veZkNXBcZqkaOk/6mXNh3Mbmw+do21VCwpsn/gha6aJmP3Top+flq+etBu1bh5H+joC4 mm/XXt6fbdC5mJJMi1tHwYP4xdy5e92/CKQLBZxhIIHOBRrvOgGWyCBt14edBKPV6eHu m20m3fBpBkoiIxH3qWrLWItAI5mAzu+EIQDjUA6MABunYo0ATm1fl35/3ubm7JRPn+AU rOsz+IkiJ/yzz+aoetikIeubq1pscjmUCsBSF6oUrKs8wDKOkLWDZox+0iFPl9GwIDnJ 1LEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532R5E+vmqbGko1l1THTzJfTq/7a4ffKn1F6N53WaCk23vrJ36Vc TCRZ9HXaq/ICTEncJ9oJ/4SGrkQXKx6CrvAn8I6Uiby1
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyR+YJDHrH4FuUO+4ljWOhR1A/pMUnyu72FXCDqkR03/YYGDkENq11gCTZ/OuFP5MWumBTnKuOWVAs1YHuI1QU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6e11:: with SMTP id j17mr9591830ljc.288.1604421283305; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 08:34:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5E408E0E-862E-480B-88FD-890098340EBC@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <5E408E0E-862E-480B-88FD-890098340EBC@apple.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 08:34:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUiBiyHDxcoe727CZW8_9orhgHmm=-La53DPg2UDQyucA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>, IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a95d5505b33670f7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/XD7OJd0KSmVfrCQ67wqa2sYKKk8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:34:47 -0000

Dear WG Chairs, et al.,
as co-author, I support adoption of this draft by the IPPM WG. I believe it
addresses practical use cases in the deployment of iOAM and the solution
proposed in the draft is technically sound.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:46 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello IPPM,
>
> This email starts a Working Group call for adoption
> for draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state. This document has been presented
> several times and discussed within the working group in the context of our
> overall IOAM work.
>
> The document can be found here:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state-07
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhou-ippm-ioam-yang-08>
>
> Please provide your feedback on these document, and state whether or not
> you believe the IPPM WG should adopt this work by replying to this email.
> Please provide your feedback by the start of the IETF 109 meeting week, on *Monday,
> November 16*.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Ian
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email