Re: [ippm] Support for draft-mirsky-ippm-twamp-refl-registered-port

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 22 March 2017 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E21B128BB6 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o4aY2rDVb72E for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47AC6128B4E for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id r203so50931083oib.3 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YdWOCiEPUv+gZ/E7b5ftXSUVQ0lukRlVewQAeiy29ow=; b=itwJcc6LgHUMOt0I6AQ6038AzlGkUplwDKLEmxK2urMk4SGGdnNDlW+aXZBnSxwN0O 1VgNctEJaGslLIFj4zt8ab5mrsNGxq5lte6soREsJ98wAhPLUCo7tWbysYM0uwADHWrk ZFQw9ByJI4ayo8f2K9J40cki4j9KHqyi85s8WH5P/Q9P5VgzQV9O9XWKvpsja9Q7F4yg rUZ6SwmIEb712UtVsImHEnlx0rvuR16UJ/qZlWYOL9xGAw2cD2lUzaXxbyhupPpiWQgB /XMRNdGTpr/AHCtZbNE1WhDIX1MZV8cD09Fd47MV5J0eQVuVpLjY5HBeyUgDnCdmBBmc t7eA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YdWOCiEPUv+gZ/E7b5ftXSUVQ0lukRlVewQAeiy29ow=; b=IssFyuzT+ZekbRRp4sGL73YinwIZpzg8nwkusVudGAy2OqvAjI/Zqx5vL/yIz/CmsV WvkoOUKWMsvZhOQmEXDULBW/BjKVgx2hao0gfudll43aeChnVSydTg2Io5AP0x8498nR nGFcSyGWWWWgjpvxuCRSZsrXQWdPIiusSnLz6ZcDFraaZ9P5Vv5Khs4OUvIojbh0f+o2 n4KdgCVl7skFRrdjx5QXzZjtUQ8GtbpvknEccI3Z383YPVOHOcUA9FR0dT6hOAaKfc7W OhzYQAtI7WHwegHX/pdS69ct0eIV127e0D2s2K28TdjNScaHttmHB2PdTDVaNX6l377L 0X2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H387TX6AR9e+Hn4n4VnDe5AulAvoIfkc2As5MFDgOjYE1wLJVV9nOQ7KKJVEKRfsTRAsQGpAPqGFLiQZA==
X-Received: by 10.202.181.7 with SMTP id e7mr7619424oif.60.1490214175659; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.21.21 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALhTbppqA5mG4HRpdSC5xa9yGg7LCpn5gFK5H7SPqCG4mMdf_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D6F9B78A-656B-46EE-A534-A0166F5A4261@nokia.com> <CALhTbppqA5mG4HRpdSC5xa9yGg7LCpn5gFK5H7SPqCG4mMdf_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:22:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXNfb+QjNPQXDDf9TbFiwzJz3WD=ErO45oRm8a7iiRJsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henrik Nydell <hnydell@accedian.com>
Cc: "Fabregas, Guiu (Nokia - ES/Madrid)" <guiu.fabregas@nokia.com>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ce460945c72054b5786e3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/XTR55jfe57E7kLbc3irx1yOfBk8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Support for draft-mirsky-ippm-twamp-refl-registered-port
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:22:58 -0000

Hi Henrik,
thank you for very helpful insight into one of implementations. I know of
other implementations that use proprietary, self-picked reflector port or
ranges of port numbers. I hope that through discussion of this draft we can
arrive to the standardized solution to ensure interoperability among
confirming implementations.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Henrik Nydell <hnydell@accedian.com> wrote:

> I have seen that some vendors of TWAMP senders (I believe EXFO and
> possibly Spirent) use port UDP/862 as default port despite being defined
> only for the TCP portion of TWAMP-control. Has consideration within ippm
> been done on opting for that port to be used also for TWAMP-test or is
> there a preference for a higher (>1024) port number?
>
>
>
> On 22 Mar 2017 7:35 PM, "Fabregas, Guiu (Nokia - ES/Madrid)" <
> guiu.fabregas@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've gone through this draft and agree with the authors on the need of a
>> well known port for TWAMP, so I wanted to expres my support this work.
>>
>> It will considerably simplify a number of deployment scenarios related to
>> TWAMP light.
>>
>> Looking forward to seeing this draft progress.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guiu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> ippm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>>
>
> Avis de confidentialité
>
> Les informations contenues dans le présent message et dans toute pièce qui
> lui est jointe sont confidentielles et peuvent être protégées par le secret
> professionnel. Ces informations sont à l’usage exclusif de son ou de ses
> destinataires. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, veuillez s’il vous
> plait communiquer immédiatement avec l’expéditeur et en détruire tout
> exemplaire. De plus, il vous est strictement interdit de le divulguer, de
> le distribuer ou de le reproduire sans l’autorisation de l’expéditeur.
> Merci.
>
> Confidentiality notice
>
> This e-mail message and any attachment hereto contain confidential
> information which may be privileged and which is intended for the exclusive
> use of its addressee(s). If you receive this message in error, please
> inform sender immediately and destroy any copy thereof. Furthermore, any
> disclosure, distribution or copying of this message and/or any attachment
> hereto without the consent of the sender is strictly prohibited. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
>