[ippm] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-18

Tim Chown via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 02 October 2023 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BECC13AE55; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tim Chown via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm.all@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 11.12.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <169625727072.58782.5427262828597841652@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Tim Chown <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 07:34:30 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/Xy0MYKFQthfoYNEe6KWppUUSMEE>
Subject: [ippm] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-18
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 14:34:30 -0000

Reviewer: Tim Chown
Review result: Ready

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Internet Area directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document describes an extension to the simple TWAMP protocol to support
its use in both MPLS and IPv6 segment routing networks in cases where it is
desired that the STAMP packets follow the same path from sender to reflector
and back again.

The document serves a useful purpose, is well-written, and Ready for
publication.

Minor comment: the abstract could make it clear that the extension is to enable
the same path to be taken out and back between sender and reflector.

Tim