Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

Mickey Spiegel <mspiegel@barefootnetworks.com> Mon, 05 August 2019 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mspiegel@barefootnetworks.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7161712022C for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=barefootnetworks.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qwMyAD4XaJnF for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7322120162 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id c2so81814317wrm.8 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 09:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=barefootnetworks.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ymS53TrEd7Lw5IS/nZp2S5AbqFalRbUre/VQzn4aTyM=; b=iKpOB5Ljw34Ted+ie/TGdM1ol6LJqCIRG1ZBL6MNsf9YUVAN27VwftUHOqV9k7oRU6 qMjTwxIc5J/Q6WnxZdJc/nCjxc3cqLg3+AEPQN/3glmO+o/CB7hU7atR/xTayjCKoMsG x6Uf+RVlVPbhWn3P+BnVdEeqOk6vpq+Rcnlrg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ymS53TrEd7Lw5IS/nZp2S5AbqFalRbUre/VQzn4aTyM=; b=MxkN5wCnWAEhs/u6o6USAYTGRvEIuHwgeDIct5bsIVajM49d22bz7YfbN0s9RLuy3K TKsEdle5cqPsag+LH2xKwtX8hT+0BC0s8aQpDY+SRR+Ul2JjLAvsrk3r36oEM05hE/Vl +eqaffHFxz0xYuk6Z+Qi5styehdO7MEtvRoSbMkEHXHjUewDPCFjD7FAr1StgiKSIQR5 07gaAi+vzyp56qtC42Id4a2Fb+yOW68iLrD3h7Y1xgnhDzn+V12+2CZj/cfxgtWF6Voq vnf+BQ85HaeAweY88vjztxVPz3ouF5EJH6ZR5zFgCUka5oc3yLbvJlytnhQVDaiI0m+R M5kw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVs51TTIInbReoqlfHeJB7sPdHwo2aTDp4GetclEX5aLjy8nb7f kGNUqATSMfYA4EJjsjhPR2WU0f9YcEaSSeoEJhXqQBXi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyD3DOHSPQgh/ItCuRP9fi1JoaHPHP0vb8hk4yf9cyAr6LKo5R/PJordCHArapjKVKcRFYJsPukRZrRyYTfarM=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5452:: with SMTP id w18mr23257200wrv.327.1565022511448; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 09:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+RyBmVnkMFEQv=Hr3y9OD09+_vocHRgnGQnLwEVO=yuTcptEQ@mail.gmail.com> <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch>
From: Mickey Spiegel <mspiegel@barefootnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:28:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CACYmcDp_KAxcpXVEKQf5KhEs4r0MnqFQV6JaRKDxhmV+0W75ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Cc: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dc616f058f61327a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/YASxmZyxUlXV6YFvOSDvn3cd3HM>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 16:28:36 -0000

Support (as co-author)

Mickey


On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:07 AM Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch>
wrote:

> hi Greg,
>
> Thanks for the feedback; absolutely, we can do this the normal way.
> Authors: let's do a normal two-week adoption call for this document before
> publishing the update.
>
> This adoption call starts now.
>
> IPPM, please respond to this message with an indication to the mailing
> list of your support for adopting draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags as a
> working group document, in partial fulfillment of our charter milestone
> "submit a Standards Track draft on inband OAM based measurement
> methodologies to the IESG" (obviously, depending on how many documents we
> end up sending to the IESG, we may have to change the plurality of this
> milestone). If you do not support this, please send a message to the list
> explaining why.
>
> Thanks, cheers,
>
> Brian (as IPPM co-chair)
>
>
> > On 25 Jul 2019, at 13:15, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Chairs, et al.,
> > I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the
> decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material not
> directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the document.
> The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many comments.
> I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to the
> charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Greg
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>