Re: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt

Hi Henrik,

Thanks very much for your review.
Your perspective is absolutely correct.
This draft is not able to “guarantee” a specific LAG path. For example, there is a switch between the two end points, or in the case the reflector is not capable.
I.e., as you said, there is no "one method fits all" to guarantee the path.

However, this draft seek another way round, the member link validation mechanism.
There is an assumption in the introduction “This document intends to address the scenario where a LAG directly connects two nodes (A and B).”
With the member link validation, sender/reflector will drop measurement data, when the test packet is not from the expected member link.
In this way, the measurement could always be correct.

This is somewhat similar to Paris Traceroute (https://paris-traceroute.net/about/) IMHO.

Cheers,
Tianran

From: Henrik Nydell [mailto:hnydell@accedian.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 6:17 PM
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Cc: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt

I had a brief review but failed to find details on how the TWAMP sessions would be "guaranteed" to travel on a certain LAG segment. As far as I know the LAG implementation may be different between vendors and as such I know of no "one method fits all" to actually accomplish the measurement.

So this draft does not actually provide any solution to the problem of being able to measure LAG segments separately and deterministically.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:03 AM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
Hi Anjun,

Thanks very much for your interest and comments.
Both are good questions.
Please see in line.

Cheers,
Tianran

-----Original Message-----
From: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn> [mailto:wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 5:21 PM
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>>; 'IETF IPPM WG' <ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt

Hi, Tianran:

Have a brief review of this draft. I think its aim is straightforward and will be useful to utilize the member link within the LAG.
Some comments are below:
1) It seems there is no Sender/Reflector behavior description for the Mirco OWAMP session and the packet format?

ZTR> OWAMP is simple and there is no reflector. The sender cannot get the ack from the receiver. So we are not going to extend the OWAMP test packet.
The behavior is described in section 3.2:
" The micro OWAMP Sender MUST send the micro OWAMP-Test packets over the member link with which the session is associated. When receives a Test packet, the micro OWAMP receiver MUST use the member link from which the Test packet is received to correlate the micro OWAMP session. If there is no such a session, the Test packet MUST be discarded. "

2) For the newly defined Session-Sender Packet/Session-Reflector Packet, how to assure the backward compatibility? What I have seen is that you add two additional fields within the existing Packet?

ZTR> I am not aware of the compatibility problem. If a node supports micro session, it can understand the new packet extension. If a node does not support micro session, it just ignores the new fields. Because the new fields is in the reserved zone.
Moreover, the validation mechanism can figure out if the reflector can support the micro session.

Best Regards

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

-----Original Message-----
From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 2:23 PM
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>) <ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>>
Subject: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt

Hi WG,

We think this is an useful work on adapting OWAMP/TWAMP in LAG performance measurement.
We updated this draft based on the comments from the meeting discussion and mailing list.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
More reviews and comments are welcome.

Cheers,
Tianran

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 2:17 PM
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>>; Guo Jun <guo.jun2@zte.com.cn<mailto:guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>>; Jun Guo <guo.jun2@zte.com.cn<mailto:guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>>; Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com<mailto:rgandhi@cisco.com>>; Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>>; Zhenqiang Li <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Tianran Zhou and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:           draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag
Revision:       02
Title:          One-way/Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Extensions for
Performance Measurement on LAG
Document date:  2022-01-24
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          13
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02

Abstract:
   This document defines extensions to One-way Active Measurement
   Protocol (OWAMP), and Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) to
   implement performance measurement on every member link of a Link
   Aggregation Group (LAG).  Knowing the measured metrics of each member
   link of a LAG enables operators to enforce the performance based
   traffic steering policy across the member links.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

--

Henrik Nydell
Sr Product Manager
1.866.685.8181
hnydell@accedian.com<mailto:hnydell@accedian.com>
[https://i.xink.io/Images/Get/N63832/a65.png]<http://accedian.com>
[https://i.xink.io/Images/Get/N63832/f97.png]<https://www.facebook.com/accedian/> [https://i.xink.io/Images/Get/N63832/t99.png] <https://twitter.com/Accedian>  [https://i.xink.io/Images/Get/N63832/l54.png] <https://ca.linkedin.com/company/accedian>
<http://www.accedian.com>
accedian.com<http://accedian.com>

Avis de confidentialité

Les informations contenues dans le présent message et dans toute pièce qui lui est jointe sont confidentielles et peuvent être protégées par le secret professionnel. Ces informations sont à l’usage exclusif de son ou de ses destinataires. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, veuillez s’il vous plait communiquer immédiatement avec l’expéditeur et en détruire tout exemplaire. De plus, il vous est strictement interdit de le divulguer, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire sans l’autorisation de l’expéditeur. Merci.

Confidentiality notice

This e-mail message and any attachment hereto contain confidential information which may be privileged and which is intended for the exclusive use of its addressee(s). If you receive this message in error, please inform sender immediately and destroy any copy thereof. Furthermore, any disclosure, distribution or copying of this message and/or any attachment hereto without the consent of the sender is strictly prohibited. Thank you.