Re: [ippm] Comments on draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ioam

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 31 October 2023 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407F5C17C53E for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 13:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id co5jK9yrbGZt for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 13:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BA07C17C53D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 13:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-da077db5145so5185658276.0 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 13:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698783984; x=1699388784; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UzQ1xBTJ7EbnUKGEIvREuxTzRTGUybiWuEoRtQD+tSY=; b=T7GWDiIEjJsQBR0q1iOFAF8u2QhMh4uVHqFTysf+LgtcqtqdxW/MbrjO7kczN4C0Iv NsGUS7CBgvImVHmfQksT/22Dx95ebXTHKAD7HxsHkXd8DR32m+1CPlSxt69SLLpz/2O+ PrazDyfHgS0/wuZl11bIF3RV+PhbRhAD8Tq/mBIg+KrNL4p38ZpFZBBi2GfY1jjGJIqn j8yMA4/o8RVunhIeY0rbdgH/OrqMvDveHT5rVQcY/oaGN1Y2RCghFkLRNkIS5sltEhOp bjdfqO3GEqyq5tpDOF220ddOZ4BGnKNuA6UhFDcWOicuZulY3r0oDZF2KqYWJhj4Ic3n 1ltQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698783984; x=1699388784; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=UzQ1xBTJ7EbnUKGEIvREuxTzRTGUybiWuEoRtQD+tSY=; b=g0xy+o/3Eql5zMeHx2wEoDxW53rYH/cdIHUAAUmdvUBYP/rLWGERiu+DimlD632tyM JA469TCc0+vrL1GQYLBeZp8fBATR+Obhc1dzZY390xltDEKKtFuiz6pyYuXC+FlR/Rfc qyiejEf/XwalXodNbKUlnVkbmgPTQYvd+9sLxjcYihkkMTtKHaLW4J5h6Ag0hJYKQ38x TqXuuUYj3fE+1sm1aaoWBvXjJqfAAga9z46YO+Jej+Pc6S8O0C3IvkKeoIzhtBN0hIih 1jB8/51TABrpYT5Ct2bt6GnF8ColVINnnqRkeBsEW0ts+YtrsGK5Dgji+RpPaESVxucS SAMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YydzsVLsnjVvQCx5+cvnFqEd/9IV3GXe3SPrk1Q18pvefQOajWh KOqXyq2U9iB27J6bozgQpV0wutyZ+yuZ/MAlQg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IELhUMEjxeCZJBQzyAzE0kIHPurGg+PXouORWQS7xQe7rBPf3UgcZFg/fMzkj9+dYl6UCrVPfPctpL+11wUjsE=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4ce:0:b0:da0:411b:ef19 with SMTP id 197-20020a2504ce000000b00da0411bef19mr11164739ybe.1.1698783984290; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 13:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM0PR07MB4131B9E1E1B099D00A0B122EE2DFA@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <202310261656266520696@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202310261656266520696@zte.com.cn>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 16:26:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6ejfS1bKKHvAwRw915EbR16T=AT04H3s6zjSaUsfwOrwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
Cc: rgandhi@cisco.com, ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ef118c060908f725"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/Yyap-kWGdfjpkwhTK1_e6zes-Cw>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Comments on draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ioam
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 20:26:29 -0000

Thanks Xiao Min for the suggestion.

I think it's a good idea. Let's see if WG has further feedback on this.

thanks,
Rakesh



On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:56 AM <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn> wrote:

> Hi Rakesh,
>
>
> I've read draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ioam-00 and found it useful.
>
> I have a thought to simplify the STAMP TLV defined in this draft.
>
> In both Section 4.1 and 4.2 it says "STAMP test packets may carry multiple
> TLVs of this type".
>
> Figure 6 demonstrates that multiple IPv6 Option Data STAMP TLVs are
> carried in one STAMP test packet if multiple IPv6 EH Options exist.
>
> Why not combine the multiple IPv6 Option Data STAMP TLVs into one IPv6
> Data STAMP TLV?
>
> Similarly, why not combine the multiple MNA Sub-Stack Data STAMP TLVs into
> one MPLS Data STAMP TLV?
>
> In this way, the STAMP Session-Reflector doesn't need to parse the
> received IPv6 Extension Header or MPLS MNA Sub-Stack, it just mirrors part
> of the received STAMP test packet and leaves all the parsing work to the
> STAMP Session-Sender , what do you think?
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Xiao Min
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>