[ippm] Paris meeting

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Wed, 14 March 2012 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBACB21F872A for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ey1gf6NuWt4Z for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED3F21F8703 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2EAGtHJ069585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:16:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4F607016.5080905@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:16:54 +0100
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: [ippm] Paris meeting
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:17:28 -0000

IPPM Group,

We have a 2 hour slot at the Paris meeting.  I'm currently trying to decide
if we need this slot for a face-2-face meeting.  Agenda requests so-far,
besides the usual administrative stuff.

1. draft-morton-ippm-rate-problem-01.txt
   new version addressing Yaakov's comments in -02

2. draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-00
   minor updates

3. draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-01
   new version.

   I have not seen any discussion on these 3 drafts on the list.  The question
   is whether a face-2-face discussion is needed to discuss issues on the
   drafts.

4. draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-valua-added-octets
   I have received 2 comments on this draft by private mail.  I'll summarize
   to the list once the comment period is over.  I'm keeping some time
   for this on the agenda though I doubt that a face-2-face discussion will
   be necessary.

So, with this in mind, if you are the author of any of the drafts, please
let me know what you want to discuss in Paris.

Of course, if you have other agenda topics but didn't ask for a slot, please
do so today.

Henk


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
                                          http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)