Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67E41200B6; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=bygDTPEV; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=0C+CpmTS
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBu5I0stXzuD; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D051200B4; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2518; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565271608; x=1566481208; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=KSOLGwcNT2jUc14Bsb5hryNXTLX8hp+p0RKgmK6Orus=; b=bygDTPEV7dCACVRCUIguE0ph7CUF4EpK7k5AGOX139YTkoQI0WIy5G9n 4nSsJP6BSE7lKSa47lqic2lTPe7+G7NRbmEKi4Pdwrj/3Ot65baYiB3j+ aTczaLMLM+lj6k61jLYPIa+si77mjvzdziWVxrtRPXn0MTyFEe5ETfKCr 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AqE3+jxcK2tP4cUVGh6leCzHElGMj4e+mNxMJ6p?= =?us-ascii?q?chl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwGRD57D5adCjOzb++D7VGoM7IzJkUhKcYcEFn?= =?us-ascii?q?pnwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/dSMzGshCVXdu/mqwNg5eH8OtL1A=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AGAABuJUxd/4kNJK1mGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUwQBAQEBAQsBgUQkLANtVSAECyqEHoNHA4RShmGCW4l?= =?us-ascii?q?bjgWBLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBARgLCgIBAYQ/AheCPyM0CQ4BBAEBBAEBBAEKbYU?= =?us-ascii?q?nDIVKAQEBAQIBAQEQCwYRDAEBLAsBDwIBCBgCAh8HAgICHwYLFRACBA4FIoM?= =?us-ascii?q?AAYFqAw4PAQIMoGUCgTiIYHGBMoJ6AQEFhRgNC4IUAwaBDCgBi2MXgUA/gRE?= =?us-ascii?q?nH4JMPoIaRwEBgSk4gwsygiaPD5tvQAkCgh2QMYN4G4Iwhy+OV4xtCYIPiCC?= =?us-ascii?q?OJAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUDiBWHAVOyoBgkGCQjeDOoUUhT9ygSmLcAEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,361,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="611114581"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Aug 2019 13:40:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (xch-aln-019.cisco.com [173.36.7.29]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x78De1CX028079 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:40:04 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (173.36.7.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:40:03 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:40:02 -0500
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:40:02 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hw2EIWlNgO3xxkIbYPuWSHRJ5LGeI/liZ3J6DAHvX0U9Yao20zHsUf+zt4BvzUDzSMzQzG5q+96MAOtutwi2ymtgQUgVpYenl+0sI5ilyWHudSFGrMRQFg6A/LDKupI0hnFgY+rAABkX0pJ3L4iSYO49jzPsfKTNRgjFmoODrI0ouEJCu2C9ITGMdmzmAqVYmVTH1a/xKxkvLs84k+eCDnCV/BhaTATJ4PhlU1K/sz2TheFnNCGD2idK2icVoqKNOJAiDrahj+gicTfAnC70wostRCPInTzWNQjDUjrWS54Oww5c1sgG53OaOSHYheURtdjvgMBOyMd0XOaGwZBxDA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KSOLGwcNT2jUc14Bsb5hryNXTLX8hp+p0RKgmK6Orus=; b=hp65KUbT8KhRkHjB6ONozlRBv/mU1MVaja3JWYaHRgnglPOBVakhepL6NPrCVT218kfkoIwN18K6JT7Lt7+0SAk4CUIrpfhS65LdXFmxthMdjsq50EWCl62arD6jOmSVfIjlXAkXyJI6ybHq2KmxScDByy0qKWGwzR0kGknGEi0NT/tdP2M6dDBVXks0rQeJxZmywfa6Lg5x7FF9V1jwHDS2ibD+NwIyglvk32rIJh+F0ilF8L0zJ408PttRkHcr5bNBU4BG1L349oBX4hQhhD00D9RZuX/7lV9W3ugq8ShCefoFu4rAJB1uYeUg4se1U9D0DFZKp3UuHkNMfVwpVQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com;dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com;arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KSOLGwcNT2jUc14Bsb5hryNXTLX8hp+p0RKgmK6Orus=; b=0C+CpmTS61KXQXc/oLgFCd90CQ/mWIa/qZw3L97UTNEsDya+1FWOZl5Wc+CE1gtYjPP6Fr+SZJnyQQg76mKT+AEa7zUEdFsrxbht/Otk6LSZ/TMz+hEvcciWwXV1ptBq0YieQ4BG7hUTk1X1Kt1yOAShxF7Wg+4CeKe3DmRlOeY=
Received: from SN6PR11MB3278.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.109.11) by SN6PR11MB3134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.127.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2136.16; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:40:01 +0000
Received: from SN6PR11MB3278.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d97f:e2dd:1ea6:303f]) by SN6PR11MB3278.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d97f:e2dd:1ea6:303f%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2094.017; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:40:01 +0000
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
CC: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
Thread-Index: AQHVQxPfo2eNNwMWVkaxT54nX8T9SabhALKAgBATpAA=
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:40:00 +0000
Message-ID: <1602821E-EE15-455D-A49D-426404EF8440@cisco.com>
References: <CA+RyBmVnkMFEQv=Hr3y9OD09+_vocHRgnGQnLwEVO=yuTcptEQ@mail.gmail.com> <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch> <4AC4BE58-D387-4230-974F-1E313AA49E45@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AC4BE58-D387-4230-974F-1E313AA49E45@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.c.190715
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rgandhi@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1006::8]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: aae36f4e-9756-4051-b6cf-08d71c05e94c
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:SN6PR11MB3134;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR11MB3134:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR11MB31341AE7692D2F176A488084BFD70@SN6PR11MB3134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 012349AD1C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(346002)(396003)(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(51914003)(53936002)(5660300002)(64756008)(66446008)(71200400001)(14454004)(66946007)(66476007)(966005)(14444005)(99286004)(33656002)(4326008)(71190400001)(76116006)(6246003)(91956017)(66556008)(256004)(54906003)(8676002)(478600001)(186003)(446003)(46003)(476003)(486006)(76176011)(53546011)(6506007)(7736002)(102836004)(36756003)(81166006)(2906002)(25786009)(229853002)(6116002)(2616005)(305945005)(6486002)(6512007)(86362001)(6436002)(8936002)(58126008)(11346002)(316002)(6916009)(81156014)(6306002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR11MB3134; H:SN6PR11MB3278.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: hwNAVjI4C8rnNleZYlVVFxT91cd0qPJ0++qoaI6+wYb1MBh1yfPkBLGB3e8Q4opE1O8ehSEKkBd3mq5A0c002Rw2Mj5EHpD/A0B6PVMczLygVbmBUT84mX1n6YLeaYYpwhNIPW8645KKtRkQ/06Q1npLvUKzLWxmtmzJ/5pjRcqCq91eBjBSpQbZGrYSvJoCwxHnjqMeOxao9PjZUKjUMJwXlaCjVIVCTYPzOZdkV1KZqxhgQvCTA0TtggQxJxPugVobFeJxy1ji9YIFM9W8gJI81/gAw+in10XJfkT+dc531TmyJ6ADKJHWiQkhBtRByHfltNl7FTm/4c5SlAgH3y8KD2TFgG/MeYfiVhujIykVfgm8KfoafJb6b+/as26YFspI3gUryve3F3SYG5NM+wxob+o6S4y5fCiV3qjHTWE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C1451B489A25614491B85BA14EB68932@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: aae36f4e-9756-4051-b6cf-08d71c05e94c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Aug 2019 13:40:00.8708 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: rgandhi@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR11MB3134
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.29, xch-aln-019.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/_xBKkPUfhgAJ9MbaB-01kzdkmsE>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 13:40:11 -0000

Hi Brian, WG,

I support the adoption of this draft. It defines useful new flags for IOAM.

Thanks,
Rakesh

    
    > On Jul 25, 2019, at 2:07 PM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
    > 
    > hi Greg,
    > 
    > Thanks for the feedback; absolutely, we can do this the normal way. Authors: let's do a normal two-week adoption call for this document before publishing the update.
    > 
    > This adoption call starts now.
    > 
    > IPPM, please respond to this message with an indication to the mailing list of your support for adopting draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags as a working group document, in partial fulfillment of our charter milestone "submit a Standards Track draft on inband OAM based measurement methodologies to the IESG" (obviously, depending on how many documents we end up sending to the IESG, we may have to change the plurality of this milestone). If you do not support this, please send a message to the list explaining why.
    > 
    > Thanks, cheers,
    > 
    > Brian (as IPPM co-chair)
    > 
    > 
    >> On 25 Jul 2019, at 13:15, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> 
    >> Dear Chairs, et al.,
    >> I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material not directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the document. The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many comments. I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to the charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.
    >> 
    >> Regards,
    >> Greg
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > ippm mailing list
    > ippm@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm